Patient Preference for Paroxysmal Nocturnal Haemoglobinuria Treatments: Analysis From the Q-Methodology of Treatment Attributes

Author(s)

Fishman J1, Wilson K2, Middleton S3, Ralph L4, Salcines J3
1Apellis Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Waltham, MA, USA, 2Swedish Orphan Biovitrum AB, Stockholm, Sweden, 3L.E.K Consulting, London, UK, 4L.E.K. Consulting, San Francisco, CA, USA

Presentation Documents

OBJECTIVES: Collect quantitative data on drivers of patient treatment preferences in paroxysmal nocturnal haemoglobinuria (PNH).

METHODS: PNH patients (n=156, U.S., n=117, EU and Canada n=39) completed a questionnaire ranking attractiveness of PNH treatment aspects, including product and clinical features, considering available treatments. A Q-methodology was used to collect the data and utility scores were computed as average ranks, on a -4 to +4 scale.

RESULTS: Fatigue levels and blood transfusions, together with dosing frequency had the highest preference among patients. Unlikeliness to feel fatigued at all was preferred (+2.13) compared to somewhat fatigued (-0.21) or very much fatigued (-1.64). This correlated with fatigue symptoms reported by patients as impactful on quality of life and mobility. Treatments that meant no annual blood transfusions required were preferred (+1.97) vs requirement of 1, 2, 3 or 4+ transfusions annually while taking the drug (-0.61, -1.46, -2.02 and -2.74 respectively). Administration every eight weeks was most valued (+2.62), vs every two weeks (+0.69), weekly (-0.38) or twice per week (-1.40). Route of administration was less impactful (+0.07 for subcutaneous pump; +0.08 for subcutaneous auto-injector; +0.44 for intravenous), however, aspects like mobility during administration (+1.74) and ability to self-administer at home or work (+1.17) were preferred. A needle hidden during administration was valued (+0.48) vs one visible (-0.02) or larger (+0.08). Scores were directionally similar for patients in Europe and Canada vs U.S., but less emphasis was given to no blood transfusion requirement (+1.31 and +2.19, respectively) and no fatigue (+1.97 and +2.19, respectively); reduced dosing (+2.77 and +2.57, respectively) and self-administration (+1.56 and +1.03, respectively) had a slightly importance outside of U.S.

CONCLUSIONS: Results suggest that the most important PNH treatment attributes are improvement in fatigue and reduced number of blood transfusions required, along with less frequent dosing. Mobility during administration, self-administration and non-visible needles are also preferred.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2023-11, ISPOR Europe 2023, Copenhagen, Denmark

Value in Health, Volume 26, Issue 11, S2 (December 2023)

Code

PCR32

Topic

Patient-Centered Research

Topic Subcategory

Stated Preference & Patient Satisfaction

Disease

Rare & Orphan Diseases, Systemic Disorders/Conditions (Anesthesia, Auto-Immune Disorders (n.e.c.), Hematological Disorders (non-oncologic), Pain)

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×