Assessing the Cost-Effectiveness of Introducing Benralizumab in the Treatment of Severe Uncontrolled Eosinophilic Asthma Patients in Prince Sultan Military Medical City (PSMMC) - Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA)
Author(s)
Idrees M1, Aldossari H1, Abushal M1, Ahmed A1, Tarek N2, Alsaqaaby M3, Dhopte P4, Basu S5, Alharbi B1
1Prince Sultan Military Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, 2IQVIA, Cairo, Egypt, 3IQVIA, Riyadh, 01, Saudi Arabia, 4IQVIA, New Delhi, Delhi, India, 5IQVIA-India, New Delhi, Delhi, India
Presentation Documents
OBJECTIVES: Benralizumab is a humanized monoclonal antibody. It is indicated for adult patients with severe uncontrolled eosinophilic asthma despite baseline standard therapy. This study aims to assess the cost-effectiveness of introducing Benralizumab as an add-on therapy for the indicated patients in PSMMC.
METHODS: A three-state excel based Markov model was adapted using 3 Phase III trials (ZONDA, SIROCCO and CALIMA) to assess the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of Benralizumab vs. standard of care (SOC) alone and vs. Omalizumab. Health outcomes were estimated in terms of quality adjusted life years (QALYs) over a lifetime-horizon. Patients with severe uncontrolled asthma were defined as those on chronic oral corticosteroids (OCS) use or ≥3 exacerbations; baseline eosinophil count of ≥300 cells/µL in the previous year. Key model inputs included rates of exacerbations, treatment response rates, OCS-sparing, and cost-components.
RESULTS: Benralizumab demonstrated a cost-effectiveness ratio of SAR 372,674 ($ 99,380) / QALY gain vs SOC, while it has shown to be a dominant option when compared to SOC in addition to Omalizumab, generating incremental 0.1 QALYs per patient at an incremental cost of SAR -268,551 ($ -71,614). Benralizumab was associated with a lower number of asthma exacerbations equals to 4.73 exacerbations Vs. SOC alone, generating an ICER of SAR 52,871 ($ 14,098) per exacerbation avoided. The increment in cost is mainly derived by total treatment costs which includes medications, administration, adverse events management and add-on costs like physician visits and Laboratory tests. The one-way sensitivity analysis showed that day-to-day utility was the most influential parameter when comparing Benralizumab to SOC alone and SOC plus Omalizumab. The cost-effectiveness acceptability curve illustrated a probability near 0% of Omalizumab being cost-effective when compared to Benralizumab.
CONCLUSIONS: Benralizumab is a dominant option when compared to Omalizumab, generating higher QALYs per patient at lower costs over a life-time horizon.
Conference/Value in Health Info
Value in Health, Volume 26, Issue 11, S2 (December 2023)
Code
EE101
Topic
Economic Evaluation
Topic Subcategory
Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis
Disease
No Additional Disease & Conditions/Specialized Treatment Areas, Respiratory-Related Disorders (Allergy, Asthma, Smoking, Other Respiratory)