A Matching-Adjusted Indirect Comparison of the Efficacy of Bimekizumab and Secukinumab at 52 Weeks for the Treatment of Psoriatic Arthritis
Author(s)
Mease PJ1, Warren RB2, Nash P3, Grouin JM4, Willems D5, Taieb V6, Eells J7, McInnes I8
1Swedish Medical Center and Providence St. Joseph Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA, 2Dermatology Centre, Northern Care Alliance NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK; NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK, 3University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia, 4University of Rouin, Rouen, Normandy, France, 5UCB Pharma, Brussels, Belgium, 6UCB Pharma, Colombes, France, 7UCB Pharma, Slough, UK, 8Glasgow Biomedical Research Centre, Glasgow, UK
Presentation Documents
OBJECTIVES: To compare the efficacy of bimekizumab 160mg and secukinumab 150-mg (SEC150) and 300-mg (SEC300) at 52 weeks (Wk52) for the treatment of psoriatic arthritis (PsA) using matching-adjusted indirect comparisons (MAICs).
METHODS: Relevant trials were systematically identified. Individual patient data from BE OPTIMAL (N=431) and BE COMPLETE (N=260) were matched to aggregated data from biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug-naïve (bDMARD-n) and tumor necrosis factor inhibitor-experienced (TNFi-exp) subgroups from FUTURE 2 for SEC150 and SEC300 (bDMARD-n: N=63/37; TNFi-exp: N=67/33). To account for cross-trial differences in baseline characteristics, logistic regression for age, sex, Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index, percentage with psoriasis affecting ≥3% body surface area, swollen and tender joint counts, and methotrexate use was used; adjustment variables were selected based on expert consensus (n=5). Unanchored comparisons of recalculated bimekizumab and SEC Wk52 outcomes for American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20/50/70 and minimal disease activity (MDA) index non-responder imputation outcomes were reported as odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).
RESULTS: In bDMARD-n patients, bimekizumab (effective sample size [ESS]=236) had a significantly greater likelihood of ACR70 response at Wk52 than SEC150 (OR [95% CI]: 2.39 [1.26, 4.53; p=0.008] and SEC300 (2.03 [1.11, 3.72; p=0.021]). In TNFi-exp patients at Wk52, bimekizumab (ESS=146) had a significantly greater likelihood of response than SEC150 for ACR20 (3.50 [1.64–7.49]), ACR50 (3.32 [1.41, 7.80; p=0.001]), ACR70 (2.95 [1.08, 8.07; p=0.035]) and MDA (3.52 [1.38, 8.99; p=0.009]), and greater than SEC300 for ACR50 (2.44 [1.06, 5.65; p=0.037]) and MDA (2.92 [1.20, 7.09; p=0.018]). All other analyses were non-significant.
CONCLUSIONS: The MAICs suggested bimekizumab to have greater likelihood of long-term response than SEC150 and SEC300 on most outcomes in patients with PsA, regardless of their prior bDMARD exposure. These results are consistent with a recent NMA where bimekizumab ranked higher than SEC for ACR and MDA outcomes at Wk16 to 24.
Conference/Value in Health Info
Value in Health, Volume 26, Issue 11, S2 (December 2023)
Code
CO10
Topic
Clinical Outcomes, Study Approaches
Topic Subcategory
Clinical Outcomes Assessment, Clinical Trials, Comparative Effectiveness or Efficacy
Disease
Biologics & Biosimilars, Musculoskeletal Disorders (Arthritis, Bone Disorders, Osteoporosis, Other Musculoskeletal)