An Early Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Minimally Invasive Paddle-Type Spinal Cord Stimulation for the Treatment of Chronic Neuropathic Pain
Author(s)
Tahir W1, Barker-Yip J2, Buchanan V1, Proctor CM3, Malliaras GG3, Barone DG3
1Cogentia, Cambridge, CAM, UK, 2Cogentia, Cambridge, UK, 3University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
Presentation Documents
OBJECTIVES: To develop an early economic model exploring the cost-effectiveness of MI-SCS vs. paddle SCS and percutaneous SCS from the perspective of the UK NHS.
METHODS: A targeted literature review was conducted to identify suitable model structures and data sources to develop a conceptual model that was validated by clinical experts. An early economic model was developed in Microsoft Excel comprising a 6-month decision tree leading into a longer-term Markov, with a total time horizon of 15 years. The comparators included in the model were paddle SCS, and Low Flow and High Flow percutaneous SCS. Due to a lack of comparative data available for all comparators, a Bucher indirect comparison was conducted to derive clinical efficacy parameters.
RESULTS: MI-SCS dominated all comparators, accruing greater QALYs whilst incurring lower costs. The most sensitive model parameter was the explant rate, followed by the odds ratios for optimal pain relief.
CONCLUSIONS: MI-SCS has the potential to be a highly cost-effective treatment for the treatment of chronic neuropathic pain.
Conference/Value in Health Info
Value in Health, Volume 25, Issue 12S (December 2022)
Code
EE518
Topic
Economic Evaluation, Medical Technologies, Organizational Practices
Topic Subcategory
Academic & Educational, Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis, Medical Devices
Disease
SDC: Neurological Disorders, SDC: Systemic Disorders/Conditions (Anesthesia, Auto-Immune Disorders (n.e.c.), Hematological Disorders (non-oncologic), Pain)