Patient Reported Outcomes Measures for Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis: Patterns of Use Among Spanish Rheumatologists and Barriers for Their Implementation in Routine Care
Author(s)
Castrejon I1, Gallego A2, Moreno MJ3, Rubio E4, Cobo A5, Moyano S5, Comellas Serra M6
1Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain, 2Hospital Perpetuo Socorro, Badajoz, Spain, 3Hospital Rafael Méndez, Lorca, Spain, 4Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocio, Sevilla, Spain, 5Eli Lilly and Company, Alcobendas, M, Spain, 6Outcomes 10, Castellon de la plana , CS, Spain
Presentation Documents
OBJECTIVES: In an effort to standardise the use of patient-reported outcomes measures (PROMs), the International Consortium for Health Outcomes Measurements (ICHOM) has proposed a minimum set required to evaluate patients with inflammatory arthritis. We aim to explore their pattern of use among Spanish rheumatologists in routine care and to explore potential barriers that could hinder their implementation.
METHODS: Two round-Delphi targeted at rheumatologists were conducted, guided by a Scientific Committee composed of 4 expert rheumatologists. The survey assessed the current use, appropriateness, and feasibility of the Visual Analogical Scale (VAS) to evaluate pain and fatigue, Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) for functional capacity, generics Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) questionnaires for health impact, self-administered comorbidity questionnaire (SCQ) for comorbidity and Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire (WPAI) for work/school productivity. Barriers to implement PROMs in clinical practice were explored. A 7-point Likert scale was used. Consensus was reached when ≥75% rated 6-7 (agreement) or 1-2 (disagreement).
RESULTS:
A total of 39 rheumatologists out of 47 participated [61.5% women; mean age 50.3 (SD 11.0) years; mean 18.1(9.6) years experience; 23.1% run an RA clinic]. The PROMs most frequently used were VAS-pain (89.8%), VAS-fatigue (66.7%), and HAQ (71.7%). Consensus was reached on the appropriateness and feasibility of pain-VAS (A:77.0%; F:84,6%) and HAQ (A: 89.7; F: 84.9%). However, the remaining proposed PROMs by ICHOM did not reach a consensus either on appropriateness or feasibility. The main barriers found included lack of time in consultation (84.6%) and the unavailability of a PROM platform as part of the electronic medical records (87.9%).CONCLUSIONS: Pain, fatigue, and physical function are routinely assessed using PROMs by Spanish rheumatologists. However, other domains as HRQoL or work/school productivity are not commonly implemented. To promote the use of PROMs strategies including optimising consultation time and facilitating PROMs collection into medical records are required.
Conference/Value in Health Info
Value in Health, Volume 25, Issue 12S (December 2022)
Code
PCR165
Topic
Patient-Centered Research
Topic Subcategory
Patient-reported Outcomes & Quality of Life Outcomes
Disease
No Additional Disease & Conditions/Specialized Treatment Areas