Cost-Effectiveness of Complete Guideline-Adherent Use of Coronary Angiography From the German Payer Perspective

Author(s)

Seleznova Y1, Bruder O2, Windhövel U3, Naumann M1, Loeser S4, Artmann J4, Stock S1, Wein B2, Müller D1
1University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany, 2Elisabeth-Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany, 3Cardiovascular European Research Center (CERC), Essen, Germany, 4AOK Rheinland/ Hamburg, Düsseldorf, Germany

OBJECTIVES:

With 900,000 coronary angiographies (CA) per year, Germany has the highest annual per capita volume in Europe. Because two third of these CAs are performed in patients with stable coronary artery disease (SCAD), this economic evaluation (ENLIGHT-KHK trial) evaluated the cost-effectiveness of guideline-adherent use of CA in patients with SCAD from the perspective of the German Statutory Health Insurance (SHI).

METHODS:

We developed a decision-tree based cohort and a microsimulation model for comparing major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and costs of real-world guideline adherence for use of CA with an (assumed) perfect guideline-adherent process. Parameters obtained from the ENLIGHT-KHK trial included non-invasive testing, CA, revascularization, potential MACE (30 days after CA) and medical costs (CA and non-invasive testing). Clinical data were based on health records, a patient questionnaire and claims data from the SHI, while costs were based on claims data only. In contrast to the cohort model, the microsimulation considered different patients’ pre-test probability for SCAD. To assess the uncertainty, deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed.

RESULTS:

In the base case, both models showed that perfect guideline adherence for using CA would result in a slightly lower rate of complications per person (-0.002 by both models) and less cost (-€796 in cohort and -€808 in microsimulation analysis) compared to real-world guideline adherence. Cost savings were highest for moderate pre-test probability of SCAD (€ 901), followed by low pre-test probability of SCAD (€ 502) and high pre-test probability of SCAD (€78). Sensitivity analyses confirmed the results.

CONCLUSIONS:

Our analysis suggests that improving guideline adherence for use of CA might result in cost savings for the German SHI. While both models yielded similar overall results, the microsimulation revealed that increasing guideline adherence in patients with moderate pre-test probability of SCADs has the largest cost saving potential.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2022-11, ISPOR Europe 2022, Vienna, Austria

Value in Health, Volume 25, Issue 12S (December 2022)

Code

EE376

Topic

Economic Evaluation, Methodological & Statistical Research, Real World Data & Information Systems

Topic Subcategory

Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis, Health & Insurance Records Systems

Disease

No Additional Disease & Conditions/Specialized Treatment Areas

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×