Cabotegravir and Rilpivirine Long-Acting Antiretroviral Therapy Administered Every 2-Months Is Cost Effective for the Treatment of HIV-1 in Spain
Author(s)
Moreno Guillén S1, Rivero A2, Ventayol P3, Falcó V4, Torralba M5, Schroeder M6, Neches V7, Vallejo-Aparicio LA7, Mackenzie I8, Turner M9, Harrison C10
1Hospital Ramón y Cajal, Madrid, Spain, 2Hospital Reina Sofía, Córdoba, Spain, 3Hospital Universitario Son Espases, Palma, Spain, 4Hospital Vall d’Hebron, Barcelona, Spain, 5Hospital Universitario de Guadalajara, Guadalajara, Spain, 6ViiV Healthcare, Brentford, UK, 7GSK, Tres Cantos, Spain, 8Health Economics and Outcomes Research Ltd, Stratford-upon-Avon, WAR, UK, 9Health Economics and Outcomes Research Ltd, Cardiff, UK, 10Health Economics and Outcomes Research Ltd, Cardiff, CRF, Great Britain
Presentation Documents
OBJECTIVES: Current antiretroviral therapy (ART) improves health outcomes, but for some people with HIV daily oral administration remains a challenge. Cabotegravir+rilpivirine long-acting (CAB+RPV LA), administered by a healthcare professional via intramuscular injection every 2 months (Q2M), is the first complete LA regimen for the maintenance treatment of HIV to be available in Spain. The objective of this analysis was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of CAB+RPV LA Q2M compared with daily oral single tablet regimen (STR) ART in Spain, from the National Healthcare System (NHS) perspective.
METHODS: A published Markov cohort state-transition model was adapted to the Spanish setting and populated with data from the Phase III/IIIb studies of CAB+RPV LA (pooled ATLAS and FLAIR, ATLAS-2M) over a lifetime horizon. Direct healthcare costs (€, 2021) were informed by public sources and assumptions validated with clinical experts. At base-case, list prices for STRs, CAB+RPV LA and injectable administration costs were included. For Quality Adjusted Life-Years (QALYs) calculations, an utility advantage of 0.02 was applied for LA treatment based on a post-hoc analysis of health-related quality of life data from ATLAS and FLAIR. A reduction in adherence rate of 9.5% was assumed for STR. Costs and utilities were discounted 3% annually and several sensitivity analyses were considered, exploring treatment adherence or treatment prices.
RESULTS: CAB+RPV LA Q2M was cost-effective versus daily oral STRs, with QALY gains of 0.27 and an additional cost of €4,003, resulting in an Incremental Cost-Effectiveness Ratio (ICER) of €14,906/QALY. Cost-effectiveness results were robust to all sensitivity analyses.
CONCLUSIONS: From the Spanish NHS perspective, CAB+RPV LA Q2M is a cost-effective alternative versus STR daily oral ART, associated with small QALY gains but also with small incremental costs increase.
Conference/Value in Health Info
Value in Health, Volume 25, Issue 12S (December 2022)
Code
EE345
Topic
Economic Evaluation, Health Policy & Regulatory
Topic Subcategory
Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis, Reimbursement & Access Policy
Disease
No Additional Disease & Conditions/Specialized Treatment Areas