Digital Health – Where Do We Stand From a Market Access Perspective in the EU-4 and the UK?

Author(s)

Walzer S1, Prada M2, Aceituno Mata S3, Aknine C4, Foxon G5, Danev V6, Vollmer L7
1MArS Market Access & Pricing GmbH, State University Baden-Wuerttemberg, University of Applied Sciences Weingarten-Ravensburg, Weil am Rhein, Germany, 2Intexo SB, Rome, RM, Italy, 3Outcomes´10, Castellón de la Plana, CS, Spain, 4Nextep Health SAS, Paris, France, 5Remap Consulting UK Ltd, Rainow, CHE, UK, 6Remap Consulting UK Ltd, Alderley Edge, CHE, UK, 7MArS - Market Access & Pricing Strategy GmbH and MEDVANCE Germany, Tuebingen, BW, Germany

Presentation Documents

OBJECTIVES: To assess the market access and pricing processes for digital health applications EU-4 (France, Germany, Italy and Spain) + UK and determine the key decision making criteria.

METHODS: National laws and regulations were assessed via targeted literature research, including official health technology/reimbursement agency websites. Additionally, expert interviews were conducted.

RESULTS: In Germany, a new fast-track process was implemented in 2020 in which 130 applications were submitted as of May 2022. 31 were accepted temporarily. The first 5 DiGAs went through price negotiations with agreed discounts of up to 67%. In Spain, some regional health authorities have developed assessment frameworks for mobile applications, such as in Andalusia in whose catalogue 39 applications are included. In Italy, the services provided by the National Health Service (NHS) are only those identified in the “Essential Levels of Care”. Some Italian regions recognise “televisits” reimbursement by considering the tariff for F2F visits. In France, there is no specific pricing and reimbursement (P&R) pathway for digital health applications. Since 2020, MOOVECARE® is the only reimbursed digital health app. An important change could be the temporary coverage in the first year of launch after which the standard reimbursement pathway would need to be followed. In the UK, the P&R process for digital health technologies (DHTs) is decentralised, hence their final P&R decisions are made at a clinical commissioning group (CCG) level. The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) has developed an evidence standard framework to support the NHS with determining the value of DHTs.

CONCLUSIONS: Although there are similarities between the EU4 + UK for the market access of digital health applications, processes vary between countries. As it can be seen in Germany, an improved pathway through a fast-track path can lead to faster and broader market access to patients.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2022-11, ISPOR Europe 2022, Vienna, Austria

Value in Health, Volume 25, Issue 12S (December 2022)

Code

HTA68

Topic

Health Policy & Regulatory, Health Technology Assessment

Topic Subcategory

Decision & Deliberative Processes, Reimbursement & Access Policy, Value Frameworks & Dossier Format

Disease

No Additional Disease & Conditions/Specialized Treatment Areas

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×