How Can the Long-Term Benefits and Harms of Screening Be Transparently Quantified and Contrasted for Informed Decision-Making? Colorectal Cancer Screening for Persons at Familial Risk (FARKOR)

Author(s)

Sroczynski G1, Hallsson LR2, Mühlberger N2, Jahn B3, Hoffmann S4, Rehms R4, Lindörfer D4, Crispin A4, Mansmann U4, Siebert U5
1UMIT - University for Health Sciences, Medical Informatics and Technology, Institute of Public Health, Medical Decision Making and Health Technology Assessment, Hall i.T., 7, Austria, 2UMIT - University for Health Sciences, Medical Informatics and Technology, Institute of Public Health, Medical Decision Making and Health Technology Assessment, Hall i.T., Austria, 3UMIT - University for Health Sciences, Medical Informatics and Technology / ONCOTYROL- Center for Personalized Cancer Medicine, Hall i. T., Austria, 4Ludwig-Maximilians University, Munich, Germany, 5Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health / UMIT - University for Health Sciences, Medical Informatics and Technology / ONCOTYROL - Center for Personalized Cancer Medicine, Boston (Harvard); Tirol (UMIT), MA, USA

OBJECTIVES:

Our aim was to systematically evaluate and compare the long-term benefit-harm balance of different screening strategies (colonoscopy or immunologic fecal blood testing (iFOBT) for individuals younger than age 50 with identified familial colorectal cancer (CRC) risk in Germany.

METHODS:

We developed and validated a Markov-state-transition model simulating CRC progression and management for individuals in Germany identified with familial CRC risk to evaluate various screening strategies differing in screening test (colonoscopy or iFOBT), interval, and age at start and end. We used German clinical and epidemiological data along with published test accuracy data from meta-analyses. We applied a lifelong time horizon. Evaluated outcomes included health benefits (CRC-related deaths avoided, life years gained [LYG]), potential harms (additional colonoscopies, colonoscopy-related severe complications [SC]), and incremental harm-benefit ratios (IHBR).

RESULTS:

In the base-case analysis, both benefits and harms increased with lower age for screening start and shorter intervals. When screening started before age 50, 32.4-35.5 CRC-related deaths per 1,000 screening participants were avoided with colonoscopy and 28.7-33.5 with iFOBT screening, compared to 28.7-31.4 (colonoscopy) and 28.0-30.2 (iFOBT) CRC-related deaths per 1,000 persons when starting age 50+, respectively. For iFOBT screening, the IHBRs expressed as additional colonoscopies/LYG were 1.3 (biennial, age 45-65 years vs. no screening), 3.5 (biennial, age 35-65 years), 6.0 (biennial, age 30-70 years) and 33.8 (annual, age 30-54 years; biennial, age 55-75 years). Corresponding IHBRs for 10-yearly colonoscopy were 3.7 (age 55-65), 9.9 (age 45-65 years), 14.6 (age 35-65 years) and 28.9 (age 30-70 years).

CONCLUSIONS:

Offering colonoscopy or iFOBT screening to individuals younger than 50 years with familial CRC risk in Germany may be beneficial. Depending on the acceptance for additional harms per additional unit of benefit, 10-yearly colonoscopy or alternatively biennial iFOBT from age 30 to 70 may be recommended for individuals with familial CRC.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2022-11, ISPOR Europe 2022, Vienna, Austria

Value in Health, Volume 25, Issue 12S (December 2022)

Code

CO4

Topic

Clinical Outcomes, Study Approaches

Topic Subcategory

Clinical Outcomes Assessment, Decision Modeling & Simulation, Performance-based Outcomes, Relating Intermediate to Long-term Outcomes

Disease

SDC: Gastrointestinal Disorders

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×