Systematic Literature Review and Network Meta-Analysis of Immunotherapy, Targeted Agents, or Combination Regimens in Treatment-Naive Unresectable or Metastatic Melanoma

Author(s)

Lee J1, Kuzmicheva V2, Lopatina K2, Barnieh L3, Janeiro MJ3, Sharma R3, Paranthaman N1
1Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, CA, USA, 2F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd., Basel, CA, Switzerland, 3Maple Health Group, LLC, New York, NY, USA

OBJECTIVES: The phase III IMspire150 randomized controlled trial (RCT) showed improved progression-free survival (PFS) with atezolizumab+cobimetinib+vemurafenib (ACV) versus cobimetinib+vemurafenib in treatment-naive (TN) patients with BRAFV600 mutation–positive (BRAF+) unresectable stage IIIC or stage IV melanoma. This analysis compared the efficacy and safety of ACV relative to other therapies for TN adults with unresectable or metastatic melanoma.

METHODS: Network meta-analyses (NMAs) using a Bayesian framework included studies identified through a systematic literature review of RCTs evaluating TN adults with unresectable stage IIIC/IV melanoma treated with any of the targeted or immunotherapies recommended by treatment guidelines. Endpoints included PFS, objective response rate (ORR), and proportion of patients discontinuing due to adverse events (%disc). Fixed-effects and random-effects models were evaluated. For PFS, hazard ratios (HRs) were estimated via linear models with identity link functions. For ORR and %disc, binomial distributions with complementary log-log functions were used to account for differences in follow-up across studies. HRs, credible intervals (CrIs), and the probability to be ranked the best treatment option were evaluated.

RESULTS: Eleven studies were included in the NMAs. In the overall TN patient population, ACV numerically prolongs PFS relative to all comparators. This result was statistically significant for most comparators, including ipilimumab+nivolumab [HR (95% CrI): 0.75 (0.58-0.97)]. ACV is associated with better ORR relative to most comparators; however, this result was not statistically significant. ACV is also associated with better %disc relative to most comparators but was not statistically significant except relative to ipilimumab+nivolumab [HR (95% CrI): 0.06 (0.00-0.94)]. ACV was ranked the best treatment option in terms of PFS and ORR, and ranked second best behind dacarbazine+trametinib in terms of %disc.

CONCLUSIONS: ACV had the highest PFS benefit and a low rate of treatment discontinuation compared with other therapies evaluated in this NMA for TN unresectable or metastatic melanoma.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2021-11, ISPOR Europe 2021, Copenhagen, Denmark

Value in Health, Volume 24, Issue 12, S2 (December 2021)

Code

POSC11

Topic

Clinical Outcomes

Topic Subcategory

Comparative Effectiveness or Efficacy

Disease

Drugs, Oncology

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×