Use of the New French ‘Organizational Impact Map’ Published by the Haute Autorité de Santé (HAS) to Evaluate the Organizational Impact of Immune-Checkpoint Inhibitors in Advanced Cancers

Author(s)

Grumberg V1, Chouaid C2, Cotte FE3, Gaudin AF3, Borget I4
1Oncostat - U1018, Inserm, Paris-Saclay University, “Ligue Contre le Cancer” labeled team, Paris, France, 2Department of Chest Medicine, Créteil University Hospital, Créteil, France, 3Bristol Myers Squibb, Rueil-Malmaison, France, 4Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Gustave Roussy, Paris-Saclay University, Villejuif, France; Oncostat; GRADES, Paris-Saclay University, Châtenay-Malabry, France U1018, Inserm, Paris-Saclay University, “Ligue Contre le Cancer” labeled team, Chatenay-Malabry, 92, France

OBJECTIVES:

HAS defined an organizational impact (OI) as an effect, consequence, result, repercussion created by a health technology on the characteristics and functioning of an organization or a set of organizations involved in the care of users. In 2021, HAS has published an ‘Organizational Impact Map’, to evaluate the OI of health products. As immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) have considerably modified management of cancer patients, the objective is to assess OIs of ICIs in advanced cancers care in France.

METHODS:

A literature review was firstly performed to identify organizational aspects related to the availability of ICI and their related period (learning or ‘routine’ phase). All identified OIs were classified into the map and its 3 macro-criteria (MC): impact on the care process (MC1, 6 criteria), impact on the capabilities and skills required of stakeholders to implement the care process (MC2; 6 criteria) and impact on society or community (MC3; 4 criteria). In a second step, interviews with healthcare stakeholders were planned to rank the criteria and include a qualitative assessment.

RESULTS:

The literature review showed that ICI availability impacted the 3 macro criteria: OIs were observed in half MC1 criteria (n=3), for all MC2 criteria (n=6) and for a quarter of MC3 criteria (n=1). In MC1, the main OI was the extension of treatment duration, observed in both learning and routine phases. In MC2, OIs were related to stakeholder’s required skills (for adverse events management), transfer of skills and logistic constraints, mainly observed in the learning phase. In MC3, the only OI was related to inequalities in care accessibility.

Interviews with around 20-30 healthcare stakeholders (general practitioners, oncologists, organ specialists, pharmacists, nurses, medicines agencies, patients’ associations) will be presented.

CONCLUSIONS:

This preliminary work enabled to identify OIs related to ICI availability in France. Interviews with stakeholders will be helpful to validate and illustrate these results.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2021-11, ISPOR Europe 2021, Copenhagen, Denmark

Value in Health, Volume 24, Issue 12, S2 (December 2021)

Code

POSC325

Topic

Health Policy & Regulatory, Health Service Delivery & Process of Care, Organizational Practices

Topic Subcategory

Academic & Educational, Disease Management, Hospital and Clinical Practices, Insurance Systems & National Health Care

Disease

Drugs, Oncology

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×