Author(s)
Al Mukaddam M1, Baujat G2, Houchard A3, Hsiao EC4, Keen R5, Marino R6, Pignolo RJ7, Kaplan FS1
1Departments of Orthopaedic Surgery and Medicine, The Center for Research in FOP and Related Disorders, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA, 2Département de Génétique, Institut IMAGINE and Hôpital Universitaire Necker-Enfants Malades, Paris, France, 3Ipsen, Boulogne-Billancourt, France, 4Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, the UCSF Metabolic Bone Clinic, the Institute of Human Genetics, and the UCSF Program in Craniofacial Biology, Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA, 5Centre for Metabolic Bone Disease, Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital, Stanmore, UK, 6Ipsen, CAM, UK, 7Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
OBJECTIVES: Fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva (FOP) is an ultra-rare genetic disorder of progressive heterotopic ossification, causing cumulative disability. Most individuals with FOP become immobilized by the third decade of life, requiring lifelong assistance with activities of daily living. Here, we characterize the use of aids, assistive devices and adaptations (AADAs) as a surrogate measure of FOP progression in individuals with FOP enrolled in a 36‑month, global natural history study (NHS; NCT02322255). METHODS: Individuals with FOP aged ≤65 years with a documented ACVR1R206H mutation participated in the study for up to 36 months. Baseline and new-onset use of AADAs at 36 months are reported. AADA use was indicated via a list grouped into 12 categories. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics. RESULTS: Data on AADA usage were available for 108/114 participants at Baseline, and use of new AADAs for 37/41 participants with any available data on AADA use at Month 36. The most common AADA categories at Baseline (n=108) were personal care tools/aids (71.3%), care attendants (61.1%), bedroom aids/devices (53.7%), home adaptations (49.1%), mobility aids (48.1%), and medical therapies for daily living (45.4%). The same AADA categories were used at Month 36 (n=41) by 65.9%, 65.9%, 73.2%, 48.8%, 51.2%, and 51.2% of participants, respectively. At Month 36, 37/41 (90.2%) participants reported new-onset AADAs; the most common new AADAs across age groups were care attendants (48.6%), personal care tools/aids, and bathroom aids/devices (both 45.9%), bedroom aids/devices, home adaptations, and medical therapies for daily living (all 43.2%). The majority of participants aged 25–≤65 years (90.9% [10/11]) reported using personal care tools/aids and bathroom aids/devices at Month 36. CONCLUSIONS: Specific types of AADAs used varied across age groups and over 36 months. Overall, reported new-onset AADA use increased at Month 36 versus Baseline, suggesting worsening disability over time.
Conference/Value in Health Info
2021-11, ISPOR Europe 2021, Copenhagen, Denmark
Value in Health, Volume 24, Issue 12, S2 (December 2021)
Code
POSC373
Topic
Patient-Centered Research
Topic Subcategory
Patient-reported Outcomes & Quality of Life Outcomes
Disease
Rare and Orphan Diseases