Drug-Drug Interaction Databases: Sensitivity and Specificity to Detect Manifest Drug-Drug Interactions, Reliability Ratings and Management Strategies of Potential Drug-Drug Interactions
Author(s)
Očovská Z1, Maříková M2, Kukrálová K2, Vlček J2
1Charles University, Faculty of Pharmacy in Hradec Králové, Hradec Králové, 521, Czech Republic, 2Charles University, Faculty of Pharmacy in Hradec Králové, Hradec Králové, Czech Republic
Presentation Documents
OBJECTIVES The objective was to compare drug-drug interaction (DDI) databases with regard to reliability ratings, severity categories and management strategies of potential DDIs and to determine the specificity and sensitivity of DDI databases to detect manifest DDI which contributed to unplanned hospital admission at the University Hospital Hradec Králové, Czech Republic. METHODS The design of this study is cross-sectional. The data were obtained retrospectively from electronic medical records within a broader project focused on identifying drug-related hospital admissions. The medication history of the patients admitted to University Hospital Hradec Králové via the emergency department in August–November 2018 has been screened for the presence of potential DDIs using Micromedex and Lexicomp. Manifest DDI was defined as a DDI with clinical manifestation related to the main or contributory reason of hospital admission with a Drug Interaction Probability Scale score of at least 2 points. Sensitivity and specificity of DDI databases were evaluated using DDI-related hospital admissions as a reference. RESULTS Concerning the sensitivity and specificity to detect clinically manifest DDIs which were a contributory factor for drug-related hospital admissions, Lexicomp appeared to be more sensitive while Micromedex appeared to be more specific. With respect to severity categories, no contraindicated potential DDI was identified in the medication history of patients and most potential DDIs were categorized as moderate. Regarding the reliability rating of potential DDIs, the most category was fair. As far as management strategies are concerned, the suggestion to avoid combination did not hit the top 10 management strategies stated in the DDI databases. The most common management strategies stated in DDI databases were blood pressure monitoring and blood glucose monitoring. CONCLUSIONS The identified management strategies highlight that healthcare professionals must be involved in decision making concerning the management of DDIs. This project is supported by Charles University (project SVV 260 551, project GA UK 14120).
Conference/Value in Health Info
2021-11, ISPOR Europe 2021, Copenhagen, Denmark
Value in Health, Volume 24, Issue 12, S2 (December 2021)
Code
POSC204
Topic
Clinical Outcomes, Epidemiology & Public Health, Health Service Delivery & Process of Care
Topic Subcategory
Clinical Outcomes Assessment, Prescribing Behavior, Safety & Pharmacoepidemiology
Disease
Drugs, No Specific Disease