A Targeted Review of Published Meta-Analyses for LDL-C Lowering Treatments Beyond Statins: Bempedoic Acid, Ezetimibe, and PCSK9-Inhibitors Including Inclisiran
Author(s)
Van Schoonhoven A1, Spentzouris G2, Westerink L3, Tiemens A4, Bilitou A2, Postma M5
1Department of Health Sciences, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands, 2Daiichi Sankyo Europe, Munich, Germany, 3Department of Health Sciences, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, GR, Netherlands, 4Asc Academics B.V., Groningen, Netherlands, 5University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, UT, Netherlands
OBJECTIVES As novel lipid lowering therapies (LLTs) beyond statins and ezetimibe are becoming available in the recent years, this study aimed to critically review the contemporary meta-analyses and network meta-analyses (NMAs) measuring the impact of novel LLTs on low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) reduction and other outcomes of interest. METHODS A targeted literature review was performed in Embase and MEDLINE from January 2016 until April 2021, to identify meta-analyses and NMAs reporting efficacy of ezetimibe, inclisiran, alirocumab, evolocumab and bempedoic acid. Population of interest were patients with dyslipidaemia, hyperlipidaemia, hypercholesterolaemia treated with LDL-C lowering therapies. Outcomes of interest were: LDL-C reduction, adverse events, other lipid- and inflammation parameters. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were used. RESULTS The literature search yielded 338 unique records, 118 excluded at title/abstract review and a total 27 articles (22 meta-analyses, 5 NMAs) were selected for data extraction. The meta-analyses were based on as few as three up to 41 studies (comprising 388 to 89,603 patients) and the majority being Phase 2 and/or 3; only one reported using patient level data. The efficacy of ezetimibe, alirocumab, evolocumab, inclisiran, and bempedoic acid, was reported in sixteen, eleven, ten, two and seven studies, respectively. Half of the studies analysed discontinuation rates and adverse events. Heterogeneity for LDL-C as expressed by I2 ranged across studies 0-100%. Consistent with individual clinical trials, the published meta-analyses despite limitations, heterogeneity and bias reported, have demonstrated that LLTs lead to significant LDL-C reductions. CONCLUSIONS This contemporary review has summarized and critically appraised the most recent published meta-analyses on LDL-C efficacy using publicly available data for LLTs. A network meta-analysis using the totality of data would help further inform relative efficacy of LLTs.
Conference/Value in Health Info
2021-11, ISPOR Europe 2021, Copenhagen, Denmark
Value in Health, Volume 24, Issue 12, S2 (December 2021)
Code
POSB2
Topic
Clinical Outcomes
Topic Subcategory
Comparative Effectiveness or Efficacy
Disease
Cardiovascular Disorders, Drugs