Impact of Shared Decision Making on Outcomes Among Patients with Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Author(s)

Dhatt H1, Marupuru S2, Axon D3, Warholak T3, Slack M3
1University of Arizona & Apex Health Solutions LLC, Scottsdale, AZ, USA, 2University of Arizona, TUCSON, AZ, USA, 3University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA

Presentation Documents

OBJECTIVES: The association of shared decision making (SDM) and/or decision aids (DA) with health outcomes has not been well assessed among pain patients. Therefore, this study aimed to estimate the association of SDM/DA with health outcomes among pain patients.

METHODS: Systematic search was conducted using Medline, Embase, CINAHL, Psych INFO, Cochrane library and trial registries (World Health Organization, ClinicalTrials.gov), from inception to June 18, 2020. Inclusion criteria were studies comparing SDM/DA with usual care among pain patients. Outcome measures were decisional conflict scale (DCS), knowledge, and satisfaction with decision (SWD), decision making, and treatment/care. Two investigators independently screened the articles identified for inclusion. Disagreements were resolved with a third reviewer through consensus. Standardized differences in means were used to measure outcomes in the meta-analysis. Heterogeneity was evaluated by Cochran’s Q test and I2 statistic.

RESULTS: Of 7806 sources identified in the search, data from 14 studies were pooled for meta-analyses. SDM/DA were associated with a reduction in DCS (standardized difference in means=-0.213; 95% confidence intervals (CI)=-0.345, -0.080; p=0.002; I2=64.571); DCS among patients with chest pain (standardized difference in means=-0.355; 95% CI=-0.589, -0.121; p=0.003; I2=72.664); and increased knowledge (standardized difference in means=0.274; 95% CI=0.121, 0.428; p<0.001 I2=75.843). There was no statistically significant association with: satisfaction with decision making (standardized difference in means=0.131; 95% CI=-0.019, 0.281; p=0.087; I2=49.045); SWD (standardized difference in means=0.161; 95% CI=-0.043, 0.366; p=0.123; I2=14.536); or satisfaction with treatment/care (standardized difference in means=-0.058; 95% CI=-0.340, 0.225; p=0.689; I2=70.756).

CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study suggest that SDM/DAs are associated with statistically significant reduction in decisional conflict and increase in knowledge. Future work should focus on better understanding clinically meaningful change, benefits of SDM among pain patients, and implementation of SDM in the clinical setting.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2021-11, ISPOR Europe 2021, Copenhagen, Denmark

Value in Health, Volume 24, Issue 12, S2 (December 2021)

Code

POSB234

Topic

Clinical Outcomes, Economic Evaluation, Epidemiology & Public Health, Health Service Delivery & Process of Care

Topic Subcategory

Clinician Reported Outcomes, Disease Management, Public Health, Value of Information

Disease

Cardiovascular Disorders, Musculoskeletal Disorders, Neurological Disorders, Reproductive and Sexual Health

Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×