Multidimensional Treatment Effect Network Meta-Analysis to Estimate Survival of Therapies for Patients with First-Line (1L) Advanced or Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma (ARCC) in France
Author(s)
Gittfried A1, Lambton M2, Nickel K3, May JR4, Branchoux S5, Kroep S6
1OPEN Health, Rotterdam, ZH, Netherlands, 2OPEN Health, York, UK, 3OPEN Health, Berlin, Germany, 4Bristol Myers Squibb, Uxbridge, UK, 5Bristol Myers Squibb, Rueil-Malmaison, France, 6OPEN Health, Rotterdam, Netherlands
OBJECTIVES : To determine the comparative effectiveness of 1L aRCC treatments utilized in France. In a Bayesian framework, a multi-dimensional treatment effect network meta-analysis (NMA) was conducted to account for time-varying hazards ratios. METHODS : CheckMate 9ER, CheckMate 214, COMPARZ, and KEYNOTE-426 formed a connected network of randomized controlled trials, and KM curves were evaluated. Sunitinib was selected as the anchor treatment as it was the common comparator. Pseudo-individual patient data (IPD) was reconstructed using Guyot’s algorithm when IPD was unavailable. Outcomes assessed were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Fixed effect first and second order fractional polynomials (FP; 44 models in total) were fitted to data for each outcome after which goodness of fit was assessed via statistical fit criteria and clinical plausibility of the time-varying hazard ratios. The predictive accuracy of survival extrapolations was validated with observed median survival, restricted mean survival time and landmark survival at 24 months. RESULTS : For PFS, 35 models converged, with the second order model (P1=-1, P2=-2) considered the most viable based on clinical plausibility of the hazards. Model extrapolations showed nivolumab+ipilimumab to be the most effective therapy for PFS from month 70 to 15 years. For OS, 29 models converged, and the first order model (P1=-1) was considered the most viable. Over the time horizon, nivolumab+ipilimumab was the most effective therapy, with the highest OS estimations after 50 months, followed by nivolumab+cabozantinib, pembrolizumab+axitinib, pazopanib, and sunitinib. CONCLUSIONS : Due to the flexible functional form of FP models, clinical plausibility should be considered in model selection in addition to statistical fit criteria. NMAs with multidimensional treatment effects offer a sophisticated alternative for evidence synthesis. Selected models provided accurate estimates for PFS and OS survival extrapolations relative to empirical data, with nivolumab+ipilimumab estimated as the most effective 1L aRCC treatment over a 15-year horizon in France for both outcomes.
Conference/Value in Health Info
2021-11, ISPOR Europe 2021, Copenhagen, Denmark
Value in Health, Volume 24, Issue 12, S2 (December 2021)
Code
POSB3
Topic
Clinical Outcomes
Topic Subcategory
Clinical Outcomes Assessment, Comparative Effectiveness or Efficacy
Disease
Oncology