Comparing Modeled Outcomes with Published Studies in the Japanese Setting: A Validation Analysis with the Prime Type 2 Diabetes Model

Author(s)

Valentine W1, Boye K2, Norrbacka K3, Osumili B4, Pollock R5, Iwahori T6
1Ossian Health Economics and Communications, Basel, Switzerland, 2Eli Lilly and Company, Greenwood, IN, USA, 3Eli Lilly Finland, Helsinki, Finland, 4Eli Lilly and Company, Windlesham, BRC, UK, 5Covalence Research Ltd., London, UK, 6Eli Lilly Japan, Kobe, Japan

OBJECTIVES: Despite the growing burden of type 2 diabetes (T2D) in Japan and the corresponding need to optimize healthcare resource use, little has been published on T2D models that could support economic evaluation of new diabetes interventions in this setting. The aim of the present study was to perform a validation analysis using the PRIME T2D Model to understand its potential validity for use in Japanese cost-effectiveness analyses.

METHODS: A literature review was performed to identify recently published, long-term cohort studies (≥3 years of follow up) in patients with T2D in Japan. Studies identified by literature search were screened to select those that reported long-term cumulative incidence of diabetes-related complications, with information on baseline characteristics and treatment regimens during follow up. The PRIME T2D Model was used to run simulations designed to reproduce the outcomes of the published studies, by matching cohort characteristics, treatment effects/risk factor progression and running simulations over an equivalent time horizon.

RESULTS: Four key studies were identified with endpoint data suitable for validation analysis from the broader literature review. Validation analyses were performed for ischemic heart disease (IHD, 2 comparisons), myocardial infarction (MI, 3 comparisons), stroke (4 comparisons) and end-stage renal disease (ESRD, 1 comparison). Where endpoint definitions were well matched, the model produced results that were comparable with real world data for MI and stroke (root means squared difference 0.45%). However, mismatched endpoint definitions meant that other outcomes could not be directly compared (IHD and ESRD).

CONCLUSIONS: The PRIME T2D Model, a novel, product independent analysis tool, is one of the few available diabetes models that utilize risk data specific to Asian populations to evaluate long-term outcomes in patients with T2D. This analysis provides evidence that the PRIME T2D Model is capable of reproducing real-life cohort outcomes in the Japanese setting.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2021-11, ISPOR Europe 2021, Copenhagen, Denmark

Value in Health, Volume 24, Issue 12, S2 (December 2021)

Code

POSB159

Topic

Economic Evaluation, Methodological & Statistical Research

Topic Subcategory

Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis

Disease

Diabetes/Endocrine/Metabolic Disorders

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×