A Comparative Study of the Current Status and Regulation of Orphan Drug Regulation in Saudi Arabia, USA, Europe, Australia and Japan
Author(s)
Almuaither A1, Balkhi B2, Al-Quresheh T3, Alqahtani S4
1King Saud University college of pharmacy, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, 2King Saud University,College of Pharmacy, Clinical Pharmacy Department, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, 3Saudi Food and Drug Authority (SFDA), Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, 4King Saud University, College of Pharmacy, Clinical Pharmacy Department, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
OBJECTIVES
To examine availability of orphan drugs in Saudi Arabia (SA) compared to the United States (US), Japan, Australia and the European Union (EU). METHODS Orphan drugs with active designation status and with marketing authorization in the US, Japan, Australia and the EU were accessed and collected using the US FDA, Japan’s National Institute of Biomedical Innovation, Health and Nutrition registries and, Australia’s Therapeutic Goods Administration, and the European Commission databases. Approved orphan indications, orphan routes of administration, pharmaceutical dosage forms used for the orphan indications and years of approval for each drug were collected from the same sources. Saudi Food and Drug Authority (SFDA) drug register was used to check these drugs availability and years of approval. RESULTS Orphan drug regulation and policy were vary across countries and that lead to variation in availability and marketing of these products. Out of 668 orphan drugs with orphan designations and active market exclusivity we identified in this study, 32% were approved and registered in SFDA compared to 91% in the US, 59% in Australia, 53% in the EU and 47% in Japan. Of the total products approved in SA, 41% are antineoplastics and immunomodulating agents and 11% are antinfectives.
CONCLUSIONS
The investigation shows a limited number of drugs with orphan designations available in SA. To fulfil the need, encourage development, accelerate availability and most importantly accessibility, a clear picture of the nationally available incentives should be officially and publicly provided so that drug developers can see the viability of orphan drugs market in the region.
Conference/Value in Health Info
2021-11, ISPOR Europe 2021, Copenhagen, Denmark
Value in Health, Volume 24, Issue 12, S2 (December 2021)
Code
POSA212
Topic
Health Policy & Regulatory, Health Service Delivery & Process of Care, Organizational Practices
Topic Subcategory
Approval & Labeling, Disease Management, Geographic & Regional
Disease
Drugs, Rare and Orphan Diseases
Explore Related HEOR by Topic
Your browser is out-of-date
ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now
×