The Role of Economic Evaluation in the P & R in Italy

Author(s)

Marcellusi A1, Ragonese A2, Manetti S3, Mucherino S4, Viti R5, Ferrario M6, Moreno C7, Di Laura D8, Carletto A9, Bortolami A10, Marinozzi A11, Canonico PL12
1Faculty of Economics, Centre for Economic and International Studies (CEIS)-Economic Evaluation and HTA (EEHTA), University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy, 2Clinical Psychologist, Italy, Italy, 3Sant'Anna School of Advanced Studies, MeS Lab, Pisa, Italy, 4CIRFF, Center of Phamacoeconomics and Drug utilization Research, University of Naples; Department of Pharmacy, Univeristy of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy, 5Takeda, Rome, Italy, 6Roche S.p.A., Monza, Italy, 7Regulatory Pharma Net, Pisa, Italy., Pisa, Italy, 8MA Provider, Milano, Milano, Italy, 9Health Economic Evaluations Office, Italian Medicines Agency, Rome, Italy, Rome, Italy, 10Rete Oncologica del Veneto, Istituto Oncologico Veneto IRCCS Padova, Padova, Italy, 11Hospital Pharmacist, Clinical Pharmacy, Department of Health Servis, AO University United Hospitals of Ancona, Italy, Ancona, Italy, 12University of Eastern Piedmont, Novara, Italy

Presentation Documents

OBJECTIVES: The present work aims to discuss the role of the economic evaluation in the new guidelines for pricing and reimbursement (P&R) of medicines adopted by the Italian Medicines Agency (AIFA) in March 2021.

METHODS: A multidisciplinary scientific group were enrolled from Academia (2 researchers), Regulatory Agency (1 expert from AIFA), Regional Entities (2 pharmacists), Pharma Companies (2 access managers) and Healthcare Consultancy Firms (2 access leads). A systematic review of the literature was conducted in order to collect the main documents available in Europe about the role of economic evaluations in the P&R process. All the records were analysed in qualitative terms according to a pre-specified analytical framework. At the end of the analysis, a consensus questionnaire was developed to establish agreed approaches and possible solutions to any critical issues.

RESULTS: A common analysis framework was applied to all countries, and the results were narratively summarised and presented in evidence tables. The consensus process allowed to collect many experts' opinions on the main issues relating to P&R approaches. All affiliated members of ISPOR Italy Rome chapter will complete the consensus questionnaire during Q4 2021.

CONCLUSION: The new AIFA guidelines provide an opportunity to improve the use of economic evaluations. Comparison with the guidelines used in other European countries demonstrates the importance of a standardised and transparent approach to economic analysis in healthcare for improving transparency of the economic modelling approach during the P&R process.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2021-11, ISPOR Europe 2021, Copenhagen, Denmark

Value in Health, Volume 24, Issue 12, S2 (December 2021)

Code

POSA209

Topic

Health Policy & Regulatory, Health Technology Assessment

Topic Subcategory

Decision & Deliberative Processes, Public Spending & National Health Expenditures, Reimbursement & Access Policy

Disease

No Specific Disease

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×