Recognising Value of Multi-Indication Therapies: Can Pricing by Indication Benefit Payers As Well As Patients? Results of a Modelling Exercise

Author(s)

Cole A1, Neri M1, Horsfield A2, Conge M3, Cookson G4
1Office of Health Economics, London, UK, 2AstraZeneca UK Ltd, Cambridge, CAM, Great Britain, 3AstraZeneca UK Ltd, Cambridge, UK, 4Office of Health Economics, London, LON, UK

OBJECTIVES: It is broadly accepted that a medicine’s price should align with the value provided to patients and the healthcare system. This is challenging for the growing number of medicines that could serve multiple indications. There has been much discussion of payment models that recognise value at the indication-level, but a divergence of opinion on the implications. We ask: can value-based pricing at the indication-level support better patient access and value whilst protecting the financial sustainability of payers? METHODS: We develop a model to demonstrate the indication-expansion journey of a hypothetical medicine and compare the outcomes associated with uniform pricing versus payment by indication. Outcomes include: patient access and benefit; incentives for innovation; and budget impact for payers. RESULTS: By quantifying the projected revenue with or without the ability to modify price, we demonstrate incentives to invest in the R&D required to launch five distinct indications of a hypothetical medicine. Over the 10-year time horizon modelled, indication-level pricing is associated with greater patient benefit (509 further quality-adjusted life years generated) and increased incentives for innovation (two further indications) versus uniform pricing. If prices are set to correspond with the indication-level value-based price, this would require a higher investment of up to EUR 18m for the hypothetical medicine. However, in practice prices are likely to be set below these value-based price “ceilings”, through more directive payer procurement, negotiation, and budget management at the indication-level, or naturally as a consequence of increased competition. This means that patients will benefit from expanded access and payers / health systems will benefit as well. CONCLUSIONS: Payment models that recognise value at the indication-level provide payers with more granular information to support value-based budget management. By providing better incentives for innovation, patients access and health benefit can be maximised.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2021-11, ISPOR Europe 2021, Copenhagen, Denmark

Value in Health, Volume 24, Issue 12, S2 (December 2021)

Code

POSA208

Topic

Health Policy & Regulatory

Topic Subcategory

Pricing Policy & Schemes, Public Spending & National Health Expenditures, Reimbursement & Access Policy

Disease

No Specific Disease

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×