Cost Effectiveness of Ofatumumab in Comparison with Other Disease Modifying Therapies and Best Supportive Care for the Treatment of Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis in Canada
Author(s)
Mouallif S1, Thomas K2, Adlard NE3, Cooney P4, Blanchette F1, Patel BP2, Baharnoori M5, Bhan V6, Clift F7, Grima D2
1Novartis Pharmaceutical Canada Inc., dorval, QC, Canada, 2Eversana, Burlington, ON, Canada, 3Novartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland, 4Novartis Ireland Limited, Dublin, Ireland, 5Department of Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada, 6The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 7Memorial University of Newfoundland, St.John, NF, Canada
OBJECTIVES : Ofatumumab is a high-efficacy, first-line disease-modifying therapy (DMT) with a favourable benefit-risk profile recently approved in Canada to treat relapsing-remitting Multiple Sclerosis (RRMS) with active disease. This research evaluates the cost effectiveness of ofatumumab against other DMTs and best supportive care (BSC) for the treatment of adult patients with RRMS from a Canadian healthcare system perspective. METHODS : A Markov cohort model with 10 total health states representing disability status defined by the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) levels 0 to 9 and a death state (EDSS 10) was run over 65-years using an annual cycle length, 1.5% annual discount rate, and 100% treatment discontinuation at 10 years. Probabilistic analyses were conducted sequentially as per Canadian guidelines. Baseline patient distribution was informed by the ASCLEPIOS trials. Each year, patients could transition between EDSS states, experience a relapse, discontinue therapy, or die. Natural history transition probabilities were informed by the British Columbia database. Treatment effects for each DMT were modelled using hazard ratios for 6-month confirmed disability progression and annualized relapse rates from a published network meta-analysis. Treatment-related adverse event probabilities were based on individual clinical trials. Health utilities and costs were mainly obtained from Canadian sources and the literature. RESULTS : Ofatumumab was dominant (more efficacy, lower costs) over first-line DMTs teriflunomide, interferons, dimethyl fumarate, and ocrelizumab, and resulted in incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) of $24,177 Canadian dollars per quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) gained versus glatiramer acetate and $28,034 versus BSC. At a willingness-to-pay threshold of $50,000/QALY, ofatumumab had the highest probability of being cost effective (63.3%). Scenario analysis results demonstrated that ofatumumab dominated second-line treatments natalizumab and fingolimod; and resulted in an ICER of $50,899 versus cladribine. CONCLUSIONS : Ofatumumab is cost effective against all comparators and dominant against all currently approved and reimbursed first-line DMTs for RRMS, except glatiramer acetate.
Conference/Value in Health Info
2021-11, ISPOR Europe 2021, Copenhagen, Denmark
Value in Health, Volume 24, Issue 12, S2 (December 2021)
Code
POSA148
Topic
Economic Evaluation
Topic Subcategory
Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis
Disease
Drugs
Explore Related HEOR by Topic