Validating Vignettes for a Rare Disease Using Clinician Interviews to Evaluate the Impact on Health-Related Quality of Life in Aromatic L-Amino Acid Decarboxylase (AADC) Deficiency in France

Author(s)

Smith A1, Hanbury A1, Beitia Ortiz de Zarate I2, Hammes F3, de Pouvourville G4, Buesch K5
1York Health Economics Consortium, York, UK, 2PTC Therapeutics, Paris, 75, France, 3PTC Therapeutics France, Paris, France, 4ESSEC Business School, Cergy Pontoise, France, 5PTC Therapeutics Switzerland GmbH, Steinhausen, Switzerland

OBJECTIVES

:
In the absence of utilities from clinical trials, health related quality of life (HRQoL) can be estimated using health utilities derived through vignette studies and discrete choice experiments (DCE). This enables treatment evaluation in cost-utility analysis for HTA assessments. Vignettes should have face and content validity; obtaining input into the design from caregivers/parents of aromatic l-amino acid decarboxylase (AADC) deficiency patients, and clinicians treating these patients is, thus, critical. The study objective was to validate the vignettes and DCE attributes already developed and validated for the UK– this time specifically for France. These will be used in a subsequent study to estimate patient HRQoL in France.

METHODS

:
Initial vignettes were developed based on a literature review, interactions with clinicians, as well as parents via interviews, advisory boards and anonymised surveys. To capture improvements on therapy, input into key DCE attributes were also obtained. The health states were bedridden, head control, sitting unsupported, standing with assistance, and walking with assistance aligned to major motor developmental milestones and outcomes in the clinical trials. The vignettes and DCE attributes were translated including full reconciliation. In a second step, the French translation as well as the content of the vignettes were validated using 4 French clinicians’ input.

RESULTS

:
The translation process resulted in minor amends to the vignette wordings for each health state. The French clinicians supported the health state descriptions with 6 suggested changes including the addition of ‘tiredness’ as a symptom to two health states and minor revisions to the language translation.

CONCLUSIONS

:
While this project supported the face and content validity of the vignettes and attributes previously developed for the UK, it also showed that it is important to validate with local experts the language when planning to derive utilities for a cost-effectiveness model of an AADC deficiency treatment in a specific country.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2020-11, ISPOR Europe 2020, Milan, Italy

Value in Health, Volume 23, Issue S2 (December 2020)

Code

PRO133

Topic

Patient-Centered Research

Topic Subcategory

Health State Utilities, Patient-reported Outcomes & Quality of Life Outcomes

Disease

Genetic, Regenerative and Curative Therapies, Pediatrics

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×