Multistakeholder Recommendations for LONG-TERM Sustainability of the Biosimilar Market in Europe: A Delphi Panel Consensus

Author(s)

Vulto A1, Vanderpuye-Orgle J2, van der Graaff M3, Simoens S4, Dagna L5, Macaulay R6, Majeed B6, Lemay J7, Hippenmeyer J8, Gonzalez-Mcquire S9
1Erasmus University Medical Center, Pijnacker, Netherlands, 2Parexel International, Billerica, MA, USA, 3Ex-National Health Care Institute, Diemen, Netherlands, 4KU Leuven, Leuven, VBR, Belgium, 5IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy, 6Parexel International, London, UK, 7Amgen, Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 8Amgen (Europe) GmbH, Rotkreuz, Switzerland, 9Amgen (Europe) GmbH, Rotkreuz, ZG, Switzerland

OBJECTIVES:

Biosimilar marketplace growth is rapidly accelerating in Europe, where it has potential to improve sustainability of healthcare systems through significant cost savings. Unfortunately, current policies and practices for biosimilar procurement are inconsistent and poorly defined, with lack of awareness of the system vulnerability. A modified Delphi process was conducted to establish expert consensus on biosimilar marketplace sustainability in Europe and provide a comprehensive strategy for overcoming key challenges and barriers.

METHODS:

A multistakeholder Delphi panel comprising 11 participants (1 patient advocate, 1 oncologist, 1 rheumatologist, 2 hospital pharmacists, 2 procurement pharmacists, 1 national payer, 2 policy advisers, 1 manufacturer) from 7 European countries was conducted in November 2019. All stakeholders participated in a 3-stage process: i) brainstorming supported by a systematic literature review (SLR) and key materials identified by participants; ii) structured feedback on statements derived from brainstorming, and iii) a facilitated roundtable discussion on anonymized feedback. Consensus statements were derived.

RESULTS:

Participants agreed that a sustainable biosimilar marketplace must deliver measurable and transparent benefits to healthcare systems and meet the needs of stakeholders. Key drivers of sustainability were identified: i) competition is more effective than regulation; ii) use of incentives to promote pharmaceutical investment in biosimilar development and biologics innovation; iii) procurement processes must avoid monopolies and minimize market disruption, and iv) principles for procurement should be defined by stakeholders and adhered to. SLR findings were limited, with significant gaps in the impact of different tender models on supply risks, savings, and sustainability.

CONCLUSIONS:

A sustainable biosimilar marketplace means that stakeholders benefit from appropriate and reliable access to treatment, which may be enhanced through collaboration in designing policies, practices, and procurement with continued room for pharmaceutical investment.

Competition amongst approved products will promote a sustainable biosimilars marketplace and could help maintain price, without compromising quality, while delivering savings that may be reinvested.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2020-11, ISPOR Europe 2020, Milan, Italy

Value in Health, Volume 23, Issue S2 (December 2020)

Code

PBI27

Topic

Health Policy & Regulatory

Topic Subcategory

Pricing Policy & Schemes, Procurement Systems, Reimbursement & Access Policy

Disease

Biologics and Biosimilars

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×