Using Think-Aloud Interviews to GAIN Insight into Respondent-Experience WHEN Completing a Resource-Use Measurement Instrument: A First Application

Author(s)

ABSTRACT WITHDRAWN

Objectives: The use of unvalidated resource-use measurement (RUM) instruments gives way for inaccurate resource-use estimates in economic evaluations. The involvement of a broader range of stakeholders, among which potential respondents (patients or caregivers), is therefore an essential part of the development of a RUM instrument. Their experiences can be included by employing qualitative methods as think-aloud interviews, enabling researchers to gain insight into the thinking processes. With the absence of a gold standard and of appropriate guidelines on the use of think-aloud interviews in health economics, these methods remain relatively unknown. Therefore, this study aims to describe a manual for applying think-aloud interviews in the process of developing the PECUNIA RUM instrument, which aims to capture individual generic resource use from a societal perspective.

Methods: The manual was developed by an international working group of health economists with expertise in RUM. Relevant information on think-aloud methods in health economics was gathered via snowballing literature searches and additional external expertise was sought. The manual aims to harmonize the think-aloud interviews in four countries (Germany, Netherlands, Austria, and the UK) by describing the recruitment of participants and the execution of the interviews. The recruitment phase describes whom to recruit, how to recruit, and the necessary participant information provision. The execution phase describes the structure of the think-aloud interviews and provides hands-on information for interviewers. This phase is split into online and face-to-face settings, to enable researchers to operate in compliance with national and institutional policies.

Discussion: This study is part of the PECUNIA project and aims to harmonize multi-national think-aloud interviews for pilot-testing the PECUNIA RUM instrument. As qualitative methods have not been widely used in health-economics, it adds value by increasing transparency in applied qualitative health economics research. The manual can be easily adapted to serve other think-aloud studies as well.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2020-11, ISPOR Europe 2020, Milan, Italy

Value in Health, Volume 23, Issue S2 (December 2020)

Code

PMH40

Topic

Economic Evaluation, Epidemiology & Public Health, Methodological & Statistical Research

Topic Subcategory

Public Health, Survey Methods, Value of Information

Disease

Mental Health

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×