Defining a Standard Set of Health Outcomes for Patients with Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck in Spain
Author(s)
Arrazubi V1, Cajaraville G2, Cantero D3, Giralt J4, Mesia R5, Rueda A6, Sistiaga A7, Benedito L8, Comellas Serra M9, Palomar V10, Suarez Rodriguez J10
1Complejo Hospitalario de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain, 2Fundación Onkologikoa, San Sebastian, Spain, 3OSI Barrualde Galdakao, Galdakao, Spain, 4Hospital Universitari Vall d´ Hebrón, Barcelona, Spain, 5Institut Català d’Oncología-Badalona, Badalona, Spain, 6Hospital Regional Universitario de Málaga, Malaga, Spain, 7Hospital Universitario Donostia, San Sebastian, Spain, 8Outcomes 10, Castellon, Spain, 9Outcomes 10, Castellon de la plana , CS, Spain, 10Bristol-Myers Squibb, Madrid, M, Spain
OBJECTIVES: A systematic, standardized collection of health outcomes during patient treatment and follow-up is a key step towards an effective and efficient health care system. A holistic approach, integrating all stakeholders’ perspectives, is necessary to ensure the best quality care. This project aimed to define a standard set of health outcomes for patients with squamous cell carcinoma of head and neck (SCCHN) management. METHODS: The project was led and coordinated by a scientific committee (SC) and comprised: (1) literature review (to identify variables used during SCCHN treatment and follow-up); (2) 1st-SC meeting (to select those variables to be presented during the nominal groups-NG); (3) four NG (n=36 experts) and four interviews with patients (to reach consensus on the key variables to be included in the standard set); and (4) 2nd-SC meeting (to review the results of the NG ensuring consensus on those variables where consensus was not reached among them). RESULTS: Experts reached consensus to include in the standard set: treatment-related (treatment intent and type, response to treatment, treatment toxicity/complication, treatment completion), degree of health (performance status, patient-reported health status, pain, dysphonia, feeding and speech limitations, body image alteration, tracheotomy), survival (overall and progression-free survival, cause of death), nutritional (weight, nutritional intervention), and others variables (smoking status, alcohol consumption, patient satisfaction with aftermath care, employment status). Experts agreed to collect at baseline factors that may affect the health outcomes, but which cannot be controlled as part of the management of the condition (case-mix variables) including demographic, tumor-related, clinical and nutritional factors. CONCLUSIONS: This project may pave the way to standardize the collection of health outcomes in SCCHN and promote the incorporation of patients' perspective in its management. In turn, the information provided through the systematic compilation of this set of variables may define strategies to achieve high-quality and patient-centered care.
Conference/Value in Health Info
2020-11, ISPOR Europe 2020, Milan, Italy
Value in Health, Volume 23, Issue S2 (December 2020)
Code
PCN226
Topic
Health Service Delivery & Process of Care, Patient-Centered Research
Topic Subcategory
Disease Management, Patient Engagement, Patient-reported Outcomes & Quality of Life Outcomes, Quality of Care Measurement
Disease
Oncology
Explore Related HEOR by Topic