Cost-Effectiveness of Nintedanib in Patients with Progressive Fibrosing Interstitial Lung Disease (PF-ILD) in the Netherlands

Author(s)

Westerink L1, Nicolai J2, Postma M3, van Boven JFM4, Boersma C5
1Asc Academics, Groningen, GR, Netherlands, 2Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Alkmaar, Netherlands, 3University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands, 4University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacology & Institute for Asthma and COPD (GRIAC), Groningen, Netherlands, 5University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, UT, Netherlands

OBJECTIVES : The INBUILD trial showed that nintedanib slows the rate of progression in patients with progressive fibrosing interstitial lung diseases (PF-ILD), yet its cost-effectiveness is unknown. We aimed to assess the cost-effectiveness of nintedanib versus usual care (UC) in patients with PF-ILD in the Netherlands.

METHODS

A cost-effectiveness analysis was performed for patients with PF-ILD receiving nintedanib versus UC, populated by the nintedanib- and placebo arm from the INBUILD trial, respectively. Cost-effectiveness was analysed using a Microsoft Excel based, individual patient simulation model with a 20-year time horizon. A Dutch societal perspective with 4.0% discounting for costs and 1.5% for effects was applied. Disease progression was driven by lung function decline with Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) health states ranging from <40 to ≥110 FVC%pred, using increments of 10% points. Transition probabilities were based on survival data from clinical trials and regression analyses. Direct and societal costs and disease related healthcare costs were included (cost-year 2019). Univariate and probabilistic sensitivity analyses, and scenario analyses were performed to assess the impact of parameter assumptions on the cost-effectiveness and to test model robustness.

RESULTS

Nintedanib treatment resulted in 0.97 incremental quality adjusted life years (QALYs) gained at an expense of €57,198 in comparison with UC, leading to an ICER of €59,002 per QALY. At a disease dependent willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of €80,000 per QALY, the probability that treatment with nintedanib is cost-effective compared with UC was 100% for the Netherlands. Results were mainly driven by disease related utilities, mortality- and FVC%pred progression probabilities. Scenario analyses indicated that the model was most sensitive to the time horizon and in- and exclusion of lung transplantation.

CONCLUSIONS : In the Netherlands, treating PF-ILD patients with nintedanib versus UC can be considered cost-effective at the established WTP-threshold for high burden diseases of €80,000 per QALY.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2020-11, ISPOR Europe 2020, Milan, Italy

Value in Health, Volume 23, Issue S2 (December 2020)

Code

PRS5

Topic

Economic Evaluation, Health Policy & Regulatory, Health Technology Assessment

Topic Subcategory

Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis, Decision & Deliberative Processes, Reimbursement & Access Policy, Trial-Based Economic Evaluation

Disease

Rare and Orphan Diseases, Respiratory-Related Disorders

Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×