Budget IMPACT Analysis of Treatment-Free Remission (TFR) of Nilotinib Therapy in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CML) Patients in the Brazilian Private Healthcare System (BPHS)

Author(s)

Kim H1, Fahham L2, Hazarbassanov NGTDQ3, Vivona D3
1Novartis Biociências SA, São Paulo, SP, Brazil, 2ORIGIN Health Intelligence, São Paulo, Brazil, 3Novartis Biociências SA, São Paulo, Brazil

OBJECTIVES

Estimate the budget impact of nilotinib therapy in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) considering treatment-free remission (TFR) under the Brazilian private healthcare system (BPHS) perspective.

METHODS

A 10-year budget impact model was developed to evaluate the impact of TFR in CML patients treated with nilotinib in first (1L) and second line (2L). Patient population was obtained through an epidemiological approach, considering total number of beneficiaries in BPHS, Brazilian leukemia and CML incidence rates (n=329). All eligible patients were analyzed in two different treatment pathways: (1) 1L nilotinib and 2L dasatinib, (2) 1L imatinib and 2L nilotinib. 2L was adopted in cases of disease progression or failed molecular response. An additional comparison of 1L imatinib scenario was performed, considering only dasatinib or nilotinib in 2L. TFR eligibility was only considered for nilotinib therapy and was based on patients in use of tyrosine kinase inhibitors for 3 years, who maintained deep molecular response (MR4.5) for the last 12 months. Clinical data such as time to and duration of MR4.5, treatment-free survival and event-free survival were obtained from ENESTnd, ENESTfreedom and ENESTop studies. Cost of treatment considered drug acquisition and monitoring, which were calculated based on recommendations by national label and factory prices from Brazilian official list. qPCR test cost was obtained from official table of Brazilian private medical procedures.

RESULTS

By the end of 10-year analysis, 115 patients remained in 1L imatinib and 165 patients in 1L nilotinib, and 138 patients were in TFR. Total cost resulted in BRL423.9 million and BRL434.3 million in 1L nilotinib and imatinib scenarios, respectively. The additional 2L analysis resulted in a total cost of nilotinib and dasatinib of BRL229.8 million and BRL289.8 million.

CONCLUSIONS

TFR of nilotinib in 1L and 2L scenarios offers potential savings to BPHS, demonstrating its importance in both clinical and economic perspectives of long-term CML treatment.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2020-11, ISPOR Europe 2020, Milan, Italy

Value in Health, Volume 23, Issue S2 (December 2020)

Code

PCN101

Topic

Economic Evaluation

Topic Subcategory

Budget Impact Analysis, Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis, Trial-Based Economic Evaluation

Disease

Drugs, Oncology, Rare and Orphan Diseases

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×