Results from a Prospective Study Comparing the Cost Effectiveness of a NOVEL Neurology Lead Outpatient Plasma Exchange Service to the Standard IVIG at the Wessex Neurological Centre, UK

Author(s)

K Kozul T, Donovan C, Pinto AA, Osman C
Wessex Neurological Centre, Southampton, HAM, UK

INTRODUCTION

Plasma exchange (PLEX) is an effective treatment for antibody-mediated neurological disorders and has been shown to be equally efficacious to intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg)1. PLEX is often performed in an intensive care environment via membrane filtration which requires central venous access. However, PLEX can also be delivered with a centrifugation system via peripheral access, for example with the Spectra OptiaÒ apheresis system. We compared the economic cost of PLEX delivered by a neurology service for both outpatients and inpatients against the standard model of care with IVIg treatment.

METHOD

We prospectively collected data from all neurology patients receiving PLEX between May 2019 and May 2020. The cost of PLEX delivered in an outpatient setting for an average 80Kg person was calculated and compared to the equivalent cost of delivering IVIg.

RESULTS

A total of 44 patients received PLEX during this period, which included the first two months of the COVID-19 pandemic in the UK. 357 exchanges were performed over 12 months. A total of 247 (69.3%) of the exchanges were delivered in an outpatient setting at a cost of £348,630. The predicted equivalent cost for outpatients receiving IVIg as an alternative, is £541,522, based on an average commercial price. The annual cost saving for PLEX over IVIg is £192,892. In addition, delivering outpatient PLEX led to a redundancy of 247 inpatient hospital beds stays.

CONCLUSION

This prospective study of a novel outpatient neurology PLEX service, demonstrates that, delivered in this way, PLEX supersedes IVIg. It provides equal or better clinical outcomes1, at a lower cost. An opportunity cost of underutilising PLEX should be considered by publicly funded healthcare systems. Further studies are underway to study the cost-effectiveness of PLEX in this cohort of patients.

References:

1. Osman C, Jennings R, El-Ghariani K, et al. Pract Neurol 2020, 20:92-99

Conference/Value in Health Info

2020-11, ISPOR Europe 2020, Milan, Italy

Value in Health, Volume 23, Issue S2 (December 2020)

Code

PND29

Topic

Economic Evaluation, Health Service Delivery & Process of Care, Medical Technologies

Topic Subcategory

Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis, Hospital and Clinical Practices, Medical Devices

Disease

Medical Devices, Neurological Disorders

Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×