Towards a Healthcare Cost Catalogue for Middle EAST and North Africa: A Systematic Review of Costs Reported in Health Economic Publications from Egypt 1995-2019
Author(s)
Zrubka Z1, Mhanna L2, Bassem Chmaissani M2, Péntek M2, Gulácsi L3
1Óbuda University, Budapest, PE, Hungary, 2Corvinus University of Budapest, Budapest, Hungary, 3Óbuda University, Budapest, Hungary
Presentation Documents
OBJECTIVES : To review the costs of illness and unit costs published in health economic papers from Egypt, as part of a project systematically reviewing health economic research in 17 countries from the Middle East North Africa (MENA) region. METHODS : PRISMA guidelines were followed. Pubmed was searched up to 15th December 2019. English language full-text articles of original human studies were included if the local population from Egypt was involved and unit- or composite costs items for 1995-2019 were reported. Eligible studies from previous systematic reviews from MENA were also included. All data were extracted in a multi-stage peer-review process involving two researchers. RESULTS : From 1646 citations of full-text English articles and 3 systematic reviews, we identified 185 papers reporting costs from MENA. Out of those, 41 (22.2%) reported 511 cost items from Egypt. One paper (2.4%) was from a multi-country study. 70.7% of the studies also reported health outcomes. The perspective was health system for 63.4% of studies, healthcare institution for 19.5%, society for 12.2% and patient for 4.9%. The costing year was 2015-2019 for 76.4% of the cost items. Most costs were reported in International Classification of Diseases 10th Edition (ICD-10) chapter I (infectious or parasitic diseases; n=44.8%), followed by chapter XIX (injury, and other external causes; n=13.1%) and chapter II (neoplasms; n=12.3%). From all cost items 80.4%, 7.5%, 1.7% and 10.5% were direct healthcare-, direct non-healthcare-, indirect- and total costs, respectively. The source was primary research for 44.3% of the costs, secondary local data for 8.5%, secondary foreign data for 1.2%, modelling for 22.0%, and assumption, estimation or other methods for 24.1%. CONCLUSIONS : Egypt is one of the leading countries in publishing healthcare costs in MENA. Mainly direct healthcare costs were reported and assumptions were frequent. The transferability of Egyptian costs to other MENA countries deserves further investigations.
Conference/Value in Health Info
2020-11, ISPOR Europe 2020, Milan, Italy
Value in Health, Volume 23, Issue S2 (December 2020)
Code
PNS20
Topic
Economic Evaluation
Disease
No Specific Disease