Exploration of the Reasons Why Health State Valuation Differs for Children Compared to Adults: A MIXED Methods Approach

Author(s)

Dewilde S1, Janssen B2, Lloyd A3, Shah K4
1SHE, Brussels, VBR, Belgium, 2EuroQol Research Foundation, Rotterdam, Netherlands, 3Acaster Lloyd Consulting Ltd, London, UK, 4Office of Health Economics, London, LON, UK

INTRODUCTION: Evidence comparing adult and child preferences consistently report higher utility values for child health states (HS). Explanations for these findings have not been documented yet.

AIM: To investigate reasons why child HS are valued differently.

METHODS: Eighty respondents (UK, Belgium, The Netherlands) participated in 1.5-hour face-to-face interviews. Respondents valued four HS from two perspectives (8-year-old child, 40-year-old adult) using VAS and TTO. Thirty-two respondents also participated in think-aloud interviews. Audio-recordings were analysed in NVIVO by two independent coders. Statements, nodes and themes were reviewed cyclically until consensus was reached.

RESULTS:

Quantitative results: Significantly higher VAS values and TTO utilities were observed for children: +0.026, +0.112, +0.377 and +0.294 higher utilities for mild, moderate, severe and worst HS (all p<0.01).

Qualitative results: 1,221 pages of transcripts resulted in 303 coded statements. Five themes were present in child and adult valuation, though with a different interpretation. Inter-generational responsibility and dependency (Childhood is a crucial time for forming life skills based on new experiences; adulthood is an important time to take care of the family); Staying alive is important (Life is worth living even with impaired HRQoL, for children and adults); Awareness of poor HRQoL and ability to make decisions (Children have difficulties comprehending poor HRQoL and their parents make their health care decision; adults can assess their HRQoL and decide for themselves); Coping ability (Children are flexible and resilient; adults have experience with dealing with difficulties); and Practical organisation of care (Children are unconditionally cared for by their parents; adults are able to organise and pay for care).

Mixed methods: Comparing qualitative statements with respondents’ TTO values confirmed concordance between the results.

CONCLUSION: Respondents showed a lower willingness-to-trade LY for achieving higher HRQoL in children. This finding may impact the youth valuation protocol and the ICER threshold used in paediatric HTA.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2020-11, ISPOR Europe 2020, Milan, Italy

Value in Health, Volume 23, Issue S2 (December 2020)

Code

PNS214

Topic

Methodological & Statistical Research

Topic Subcategory

PRO & Related Methods

Disease

No Specific Disease

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×