Comparative Effectiveness and Safety of Low Dose of ORAL Anticoagulant in Patients with NON-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation

Author(s)

Perreault S1, Côté R2, De Denus S1, Dorais M3
1University of Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada, 2Montreal General Hospital, Montreal, QC, Canada, 3StatSiences Inc,, Notre-Dame-de-l'Ile-Perrot, QC, Canada

OBJECTIVES. Observational studies have examined the direct oral anticoagulant (DOACs) dosage used in non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). Studies reported that a greater proportion received low dose DOACs in contrast to RCT. Comparative effectiveness and safety of low dose DOACs to warfarin in NVAF patients need to be addressed. To assess comparative effectiveness and safety of low dose DOACs to warfarin and apixaban.

METHODS. We built a cohort using Quebec administrative databases (Med-Echo and RAMQ) from 2011 to 2018 in NVAF patients hospitalized and discharged in the community. Cohort entry was defined as the first OAC claim in new users, defined as no OAC claims in 1-year prior. We determined patient demographics, comorbidities, CHA2DS2-VASc score and HASBLED for 3-year prior to cohort entry. Medication use was documented 2 weeks prior to cohort entry. Effectiveness outcomes (ischemic stroke/systemic thrombosis, myocardial infarction, death, composite) and safety outcomes (intracranial bleeding, extracranial major bleeding, composite) were assessed at 1-year follow-up or censoring. We conducted a propensity score matched population and hazard ratios (HRs) for outcomes were estimated using Cox proportional hazard models. Several sensitivity analyses were performed.

RESULTS. The cohort consisted of 22,969 incident OAC new users aged between 80-86 years. Comparative effectiveness and safety outcomes of low dose dabigatran and rivaroxaban relative to warfarin suggested that there was no significant difference. Although, low dose apixaban presented a better safety profile with risk reduction for ICH (HR: 0.66; 95%CI 0.43-0.99), extracranial bleeding (HR: 58; 0.40-0.84), and safety composite (HR: 0.61; 0.46-0.81). For relative comparisons of dabigatran or rivaroxaban to apixaban, no significant difference for the effectiveness outcomes but an increasing risk of major bleeding.

CONCLUSIONS.

Almost half of patients in our cohort were treated with low dose DOAC. The effectiveness does not seem to vary across OAC but apixaban had a better safety profile.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2020-11, ISPOR Europe 2020, Milan, Italy

Value in Health, Volume 23, Issue S2 (December 2020)

Code

PCV10

Topic

Clinical Outcomes, Epidemiology & Public Health

Topic Subcategory

Clinical Outcomes Assessment, Comparative Effectiveness or Efficacy, Safety & Pharmacoepidemiology

Disease

Cardiovascular Disorders, Drugs

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×