Psychometric Validation of the P-SIM, a NOVEL Patient-Reported Outcome Instrument for Patients with Plaque Psoriasis
Author(s)
Warren RB1, Gottlieb AB2, Merola JF3, Garcia L4, Cioffi C5, Peterson L5, Pelligra C6, Ciaravino V7
1The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK, 2Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA, 3Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA, 4UCB Pharma, Slough, UK, 5UCB Pharma, Raleigh, NC, USA, 6Evidera, Medellín, Colombia, 7UCB Pharma, Saint-Laurent-de-Mure, 69, France
Presentation Documents
OBJECTIVES : Plaque psoriasis (PSO) can significantly impact patients’ quality of life. We assessed psychometric properties of the Psoriasis Symptoms and Impacts Measure (P-SIM), developed to capture patients’ experiences of signs, symptoms, and impacts of PSO. METHODS : Pooled, blinded data from 1,002 patients in the BE VIVID (NCT03370133) and BE READY (NCT03410992) bimekizumab phase 3 trials were analysed. Average weekly scores (considered missing if >3 daily scores were missing) were derived for the 14 P-SIM items. Test-retest reliability was evaluated using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). Convergent validity was assessed between P-SIM and relevant patient-reported outcome (PRO) (Dermatology Life Quality Index [DLQI], DLQI Item 1 [skin symptoms], Patient Global Assessment of Psoriasis) and clinician-reported outcome (ClinRO) scores (Psoriasis Area and Severity Index [PASI], Investigator’s Global Assessment [IGA]) at baseline and Week 16. Known-groups validity was assessed, comparing P-SIM scores between patient subgroups pre-defined using PRO/ClinRO measures. 16-week responsiveness was evaluated; responder definition (RD) thresholds were proposed. RESULTS : 16-week average P-SIM completion rate was 85.2%. Test-retest reliability analyses demonstrated excellent score reproducibility (ICC: 0.91–0.98). Inter-item correlations at baseline and Week 16 were strong (>0.5), apart from “Choice of clothing” with “Pain” and “Burning” at baseline (both 0.49). All P-SIM scores were moderately-to-strongly correlated with other outcomes, demonstrating convergent validity, apart from ClinROs (PASI, IGA) at baseline that had low variability. P-SIM scores discriminated between pre-defined subgroups at Week 16, confirming known‑groups validity. 16-week changes from baseline in P-SIM and other outcome scores were moderately-to-strongly correlated (>0.5; weaker with PASI, IGA), establishing responsiveness. Anchor-based RD analyses determined a 4-point P-SIM item score decrease as indicative of marked clinically meaningful improvement; lower thresholds (1.98–2.86; “Itch”, “Pain”, “Scaling” scores) were previously determined in phase 2b data analyses. CONCLUSIONS : P-SIM scores demonstrated good reliability, validity, and responsiveness. A 4-point RD threshold could be used to assess 16-week treatment effects.
Conference/Value in Health Info
2020-11, ISPOR Europe 2020, Milan, Italy
Value in Health, Volume 23, Issue S2 (December 2020)
Code
PBI56
Topic
Patient-Centered Research
Topic Subcategory
Instrument Development, Validation, & Translation, Patient-reported Outcomes & Quality of Life Outcomes
Disease
Biologics and Biosimilars