Systematic Review of Efficacy of Programmed Death (PD)-1 and PD-Ligand-1 Inhibitors in the Treatment of NON-SMALL CELL LUNG Cancer

Author(s)

Lingohr-Smith M, Deitelzweig C, Lin G, Lin J
Novosys Health, Green Brook, NJ, USA

OBJECTIVES: Programmed death (PD)-1 and PD-ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors are used as monotherapies or in combination with other agents to treat non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), a leading cause of cancer deaths worldwide. We conducted a systematic search to compare the efficacy of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in the treatment of NSCLC.

METHODS: A systematic literature search of PubMed was conducted to identify phase III clinical trials in which the efficacy of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in the treatment of NSCLC was evaluated. PD-1 inhibitors included nivolumab and pembrolizumab; PD-L1 inhibitors included atezolizumab, avelumab, and durvalumab. Patient characteristics and efficacy data were extracted.

RESULTS: Sixteen phase III clinical trials were identified (nivolumab=4; pembrolizumab=5; atezolizumab=5; avelumab=1; durvalumab=1). Across the 3 nivolumab monotherapy trials (n=638; median ages: 61-63 years), median progression-free survival (PFS) ranged 2.3-4.2 months; response rates ranged 19%-26%. Nivolumab in combination with iplimumab (n=583; median age: 64 years) had a median PFS of 5.1 months and response rate of 33%. Across the 3 pembrolizumab monotherapy trials (n=1,481; median ages: 63-64 years), median PFS ranged 3.9-10.3 months; response rates ranged 18%-45%. In the 2 pembrolizumab combination therapy trials (n=688; median ages: 65 years), median PFS ranged 6.4-8.8 months; response rates ranged 48%-58%. In the 4 atezolizumab combination therapy trials (n=1,486; median ages: 63-64 years), median PFS ranged 6.3-8.3 months; response rates ranged 47%-63.5%. In the 3 monotherapy trials of atezolizumab (n=613; median age: 63 years), avelumab (n=396; median age: 64 years), and durvalumab (n=476; median age: 64 years), the median months of PFS were 2.7, 2.8, and 17.2, respectively; response rates were 14%, 15%, and 30%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS: Most of the evaluated PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors improved outcomes of NSCLC clinical trial patients; however, responses varied. This efficacy comparison of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in the treatment of NSCLC may be of value to healthcare providers and payers.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2020-11, ISPOR Europe 2020, Milan, Italy

Value in Health, Volume 23, Issue S2 (December 2020)

Code

PCN25

Topic

Clinical Outcomes

Topic Subcategory

Clinical Outcomes Assessment

Disease

Oncology

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×