PATIENT REPORTED OUTCOME MEASUREMENT- USING EQ-5D-3L PROFILES TO ASSESS QUALITY OF LIFE OF TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT PATIENTS

Author(s)

Parkin D1, Shaw R2, Do Rego B3
1City University of London, London, UK, 2Depuy Synthes, Amersfoort, Netherlands, 3DePuy Synthes, Leeds, UK

OBJECTIVES: (1)Assess patients’ quality of life before and after total primary knee replacement using EQ-5D-3L profiles. (2)Demonstrate the information gained from disaggregated Patient Reported Outcome Measures instead of utility or other summary scores.

METHODS: Patient and clinical outcomes data from two multicentre studies were re-analysed, focusing on descriptions of patients’ quality of life using the EQ-5D-3L. 1,879 patients were included from 4 countries(USA, UK, Australia, New Zealand) operated on by the same surgeons using two different knee replacement systems. Descriptive analyses included levels (no, some, severe problems) within EQ-5D dimensions (Mobility, Self-Care, Usual Activities, Pain & Discomfort, Anxiety & Depression) and profiles (combinations of dimensions and levels) at baseline and 3 follow-up points, including changes over time and differences between implants and countries. Regression analysis quantified the relationship between the EQ-5D-3L components and the EQ VAS.

RESULTS: Problems with Mobility, Usual Activities and Pain & Discomfort, in that order, were most frequent for pre-operative patients. There were large improvements in every dimension after surgery, but the time that this was observed differed: for Mobility, Self-Care and Anxiety & Depression, most of the improvement occurred during the first year; for Usual Activities and Pain & Discomfort, over two years. Additionally, 56% of patients reported no problems with pain & discomfort, 70% with usual activities and 79% with mobility. Analysing profiles, 85% of patients experienced an unequivocal improvement, 5.9% had no change, 3.5% worsened and 5.6% a mixed change at two years follow-up. Anxiety & Depression had the greatest impact on EQ VAS scores; while Mobility and Usual Activities were also important; Usual Activities was particularly important post-surgery.

CONCLUSIONS: The methods revealed insights that PROMs summary scores obscure, including how conditions and treatments impact on different aspects of patients’ quality of life and their relative importance to self-assessed quality of life overall.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2019-11, ISPOR Europe 2019, Copenhagen, Denmark

Code

PMD61

Topic

Medical Technologies, Methodological & Statistical Research, Patient-Centered Research

Topic Subcategory

Medical Devices, Patient-reported Outcomes & Quality of Life Outcomes, PRO & Related Methods

Disease

Medical Devices, Musculoskeletal Disorders, Surgery

Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×