COST-EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS OF SUCROSE OCTASULFATE (URGOSTART) DRESSING IN THE TREATMENT OF DIABETIC FOOT AND VENOUS LEG ULCERS

Author(s)

Mlcoch T, Bartakova J, Chadimova K, Ornstová E, Hajickova B, Dolezal T
VALUE OUTCOMES, Prague, 102, Czech Republic

Presentation Documents

OBJECTIVES: To assess cost-effectiveness of a sucrose octasulfate dressing (SOD, UrgoStart) versus a control dressing (CD, UrgoTul) on wound closure in patient with venous leg ulcers (VLU) and neuroischaemic diabetic foot ulcers (NDFU) in the Czech Republic.

METHODS: Based on randomised double-blind controlled trials (RCT: EXPLORER, CHALLENGE), we developed a one-year decision-tree model using TreeAge Pro. Depending on response to treatment, the model structure consists of two mutually exclusive health states: “treatment success” and “treatment failure”. If treatment fails, the 2nd line of treatment (compression wrap therapy) is started. The 2nd line of treatment can be accompanied either by mild adverse events (AE), severe AE (requiring hospitalization) or without AE. The model structure reflects the patient journey through the Czech healthcare system. Transition probabilities between health states were provided by RCTs, utilities by systematic literature review, costs and healthcare structure by reimbursement tariffs and expert opinion. Two parallel models with the same structure but different inputs were run for each kind of wound (VLU, NDFU) using an implicit willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of €47,000 per quality-adjusted life year (QALY). Sensitivity analyses were used to explore the impact of variations.

RESULTS: From a health care payer perspective, SOD for NDFU and VLU were dominant. SOD brought 0.03 (0.67 vs. 0.64) and 0.05 (0.53 vs. 0.48) incremental QALY, respectively. Incremental costs were €-5 (€1,518 vs. €1,523) and €-143 (€925 vs. €783), respectively. Sensitivity analysis showed that even with the SOD price ten-time higher than CD, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio stayed well below WTP threshold (€21,777 for NDFU and €2,888 for VLU).

CONCLUSIONS: The results of the models indicate that SOD is highly cost-effective dressing for NDFU/VLU in the Czech Republic. Sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of the base-case results with all one-way changes and scenarios deeply below WTP.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2019-11, ISPOR Europe 2019, Copenhagen, Denmark

Code

PMD22

Topic

Clinical Outcomes, Economic Evaluation, Medical Technologies, Methodological & Statistical Research

Topic Subcategory

Comparative Effectiveness or Efficacy, Medical Devices, Modeling and simulation

Disease

Cardiovascular Disorders, Diabetes/Endocrine/Metabolic Disorders, Medical Devices, Neurological Disorders

Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×