CAN THE PURCHASING PERFORMANCE OF HEALTHCARE INSTITUTIONS BE ASSESSED VIA THE DATA DECLARED FOR REIMBURSEMENT?

Author(s)

Tano M1, Degrassat-Théas A2, Ribault M3, Paubel P4
1General Agency of Equipment and Health Products (AGEPS), Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Issy les Moulineaux, 92, France, 2General Agency of Equipment and Health Products (AGEPS), Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP); Health Law Institute, INSERM UMR S 1145, Paris Descartes University; Faculty of pharmacy, Paris Descartes University, Paris, France, 3General Agency of Equipment and Health Products (AGEPS), Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Paris, France, 4General Agency of Equipment and Health Products (AGEPS), Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP); Health Law Institute, INSERM UMR S 1145, Paris University ; Faculté of pharmacy, Paris University, Paris, France

OBJECTIVES: French health authorities rely on information reported by healthcare facilities in E-PMSI to assess hospital activity and ensure their reimbursement. Some of these data are restored in open access (ScanSante database) and therefore can be used to improve purchasing performance through benchmark studies. Nevertheless, a previous study suggested obvious misreporting errors regarding expensive drug prices. We aim to explore the confidence that can be placed in these declarative data. METHODS: This retrospective study assesses open data robustness based on reported annual quantities and spending of expensive drugs reimbursed in addition to the diagnosis related group tariff. We deduced the 2017 average purchasing prices (prices are confidential) for APHP (Paris hospitals, e-PMSI database) and for French hospitals formerly under overall allocation (ex-UOA, ScanSante database) and compared it to the national reimbursement price cap (RPC) (the oldest of the year, if so). The relative price differential (RPD%) should be negative or zero. Then, we compared (as an external validation) APHP monthly declared data in 2018 with accurate market data and with monthly RPC applicable in 2018. RESULTS:APHP and ex-UOA hospitals consumed 216 expensive drugs of the additional list in 2017. Significant errors affected 25% of it (RPD>1%) that indicates data entry mistakes (RPD min: +1,01%; max: +152,2%; average:+7,3%). Reported biases concerned primarily immunosuppressors and antihemorragic agents. In 2018 in APHP, 48% of the declared purchasing price (n=222) were superior to the RPC and 35% were higher than the accurate market prices. Deviations were particularly explained by the price declaration of old contracts, repealed references and declared consumption unit errors. CONCLUSIONS:Despite the conservative methodology adopted, our study highlights the poor quality of the declarative data that limit their use. Improved data capture is a major challenge because of the financial consequences for institutions in terms of refunds granted.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2019-11, ISPOR Europe 2019, Copenhagen, Denmark

Code

PDG13

Topic

Economic Evaluation, Health Policy & Regulatory, Real World Data & Information Systems

Topic Subcategory

Data Protection, Integrity, & Quality Assurance, Public Spending & National Health Expenditures

Disease

No Specific Disease

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×