PHARMACOECONOMIC EVALUATION OF ANTI-VEGF DRUGS AND LASER PHOTOCOAGULATION FOR THE TREATMENT OF DIABETIC MACULAR EDEMA IN CHINA

Author(s)

Liu J1, He X1, Jiang Y2, Ren X3, Wu J1
1School of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology, Tianjin University, Tianjin, China, 2School of Public Health, Sun Yat-sen University, Shenzhen, China, 3Beijing Novartis Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Beijing, China

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of anti-VEGF drugs (ranibizumab, aflibercept) and laser photocoagulation for the treatment of diabetic macular edema (DME) from Chinese societal perspective.

METHODS

A Markov model was constructed to simulate the long-term outcomes and costs in Chinese DME patients. Model health states were defined by the best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) intervals ranging from ≤ 25 letters to 86-100 letters, with an extra absorbing state 'death'. Lifetime horizon was used, with a 3-month cycle length. Transition probabilities were calculated from the RESTORE clinical trial and published network meta-analysis. Health state utilities were estimated through literature, and costs were estimated from experts consultation of 6 hospitals in China and published literature.The primary outcomes of the model were costs, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). Uncertainty was addressed via univariate and probabilistic sensitivity analyses.

RESULTS

Lifetime costs per patient of treating DME were ¥71,649 for ranibizumab, ¥93,702 for aflibercept, and ¥50,850 for laser photocoagulation; lifetime QALYs gained were 6.87 for ranibizumab, 6.84 for aflibercept, and 6.53 for laser photocoagulation. The ICER comparing ranibizumab with laser photocoagulation was ¥61,174/QALY, comparing aflibercept with laser photocoagulation was ¥138,232/QALY. Based on the generally accepted Chinese ICER threshold of ¥180,000/ QALY (3 times per-capita GDP, 2017 China), ranibizumab and aflibercept were found to be cost-effective compared with laser photocoagulation. Comparing ranibizumab with aflibercept, ranibizumab was the dominant therapy, with an incremental gain of 0.03 QALYs and cost savings of ¥22,053. Probabilistic sensitivity analyses showed ranibizumab had 72.1% and 84.7% probability, respectively, of being cost-effective relative to aflibercept and laser photocoagulation at a willingness-to-pay threshold of ¥180,000/ QALY.

CONCLUSIONS

From Chinese societal perspective, anti-VEGF drugs (ranibizumab, aflibercept) are the cost-effective therapies for the treatment of DME compared with laser photocoagulation,and ranibizumab is the dominant therapy when compared to aflibercept.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2019-11, ISPOR Europe 2019, Copenhagen, Denmark

Code

PDG30

Topic

Economic Evaluation

Disease

Drugs

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×