COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF GUIDED INTERNET-DELIVERED COGNITIVE BEHAVIORAL THERAPY IN COMPARISON WITH CARE-AS-USUAL FOR PATIENTS WITH INSOMNIA IN GENERAL PRACTICE

Author(s)

Baka A1, Van der Zweerde T2, Lancee J3, Bosmans J2, Van Straten A2
1Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, NH, Netherlands, 2Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 3Universiteit van Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands

OBJECTIVES : Insomnia is associated with significant economic consequences, mainly due to work absenteeism. Although cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia (CBT-I) has been shown to be effective for insomnia, general practitioners (GPs) do not regularly subscribe CBT-I as first line of treatment. Internet-delivered CBT-I presents an alternative to bridge this gap while efficiently using scarce resources. The aim of this study was to estimate the cost-effectiveness of a guided, internet-delivered intervention compared to care-as-usual for insomnia patients in general practice from a societal perspective.

METHODS : An economic evaluation was conducted alongside a randomized clinical trial with 26 weeks follow-up. Primary outcomes were insomnia severity (score on and clinically relevant response measured by the Insomnia Severity Index, ISI) and Quality-Adjusted Life Years (QALYs). Societal costs were assessed at baseline, and at 8 and 26 weeks. Missing data was imputed using multiple imputation. Statistical uncertainty around cost and effect differences and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were estimated using bootstrapping, and presented using cost-effectiveness acceptability curves.

RESULTS : Mean societal costs in the intervention group were statistically non-significantly lower than in the care-as-usual group (-€318; 95% CI -1282 to 645). Cost-effectiveness analyses revealed a 95% probability of the intervention being cost-effective as compared to care-as-usual at ceiling ratios of €450/extra point of decrease in ISI and €7,000/additional response to treatment, respectively. At a ceiling ratio of 30,000 €/extra QALY gained, the probability of the intervention being cost-effective was 69%. Sensitivity analyses gave similar results.

CONCLUSIONS : The intervention was considered cost-effective in comparison with care-as-usual for patients with insomnia treated in general practice from the societal perspective. However, the probability of the intervention being cost-effective as compared to care-as-usual was lower for the QALY outcome. We conclude that internet-delivered CBT-I is a promising and efficient intervention to reduce the personal and societal burden associated with insomnia.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2019-11, ISPOR Europe 2019, Copenhagen, Denmark

Code

PMH31

Topic

Clinical Outcomes, Economic Evaluation, Medical Technologies

Topic Subcategory

Clinical Outcomes Assessment, Digital Health, Trial-Based Economic Evaluation

Disease

Mental Health

Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×