IS DEFLAZACORT A COST-EFFECTIVE TREATMENT FOR DUCHENNE MUSCULAR DYSTROPHY?

Author(s)

Quach D1, Boyer N2, Samur S3, Fluetsch N3, Otuonye I3, Rind D3, Walton SM4
1University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA, 2University of Chicago Hospital Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA, 3Institute for Clinical and Economic Review, Boston, MA, USA, 4Department of Pharmacy Systems, Outcomes and Policy, College of Pharmacy, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA

OBJECTIVES

:
Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) is a rare, fatal genetic neuromuscular disease. To date there is a paucity of published information regarding the cost-effectiveness of deflazacort versus prednisone for these patients. This study provides an evidence-based cost-effectiveness assessment of deflazacort relative to prednisone.

METHODS

:
A Partitioned Survival Model (PartSA) was developed based on a previous research effort that measured time to loss of ambulation and death from DMD patients on corticosteroids using Kaplan-Meier curves, and on previous survey-based evidence regarding supportive care costs and health utility for ambulatory and non-ambulatory DMD patients. As a conservative assumption, a highly favorable but still evidence-based treatment effect that shifted both the ambulation survival curve and mortality curve by two years was used to estimate changes in quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and direct medical costs for deflazacort. The analysis took a United States health sector perspective and a modified societal perspective over a lifetime time horizon and used a 3% discount rate. Deterministic sensitivity analysis (DSA) and probabilistic sensitivity analyses (PSA) were also performed.

RESULTS

:
Even with very favorable assumptions regarding treatment effects for deflazacort, the incremental cost effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were $790,000/QALY gained and $829,000/QALY gained for the health sector perspective and modified societal perspective, respectively. Treatment effect, deflazacort drug cost, and ambulatory health utility were the most sensitive in the DSA. In the PSA, deflazacort had a 0% probability of being cost-effective at a willingness to pay threshold of $150,000/QALY gained and a 2.79% probability at $500,000/QALY gained.

CONCLUSIONS

:
The evidence for evaluating the cost-effectiveness of treatments for DMD is sparse. However, available evidence suggests deflazacort at current prices is highly likely to have ICERs exceeding standard thresholds when compared to prednisone.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2019-11, ISPOR Europe 2019, Copenhagen, Denmark

Code

PMS57

Topic

Economic Evaluation

Disease

Musculoskeletal Disorders

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×