HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT DECISIONS OVER THE LAST DECADE IN THE UNITED KINGDOM AND THE NETHERLANDS - A FOCUS ON NON-SMALL-CELL LUNG CANCER

Author(s)

Westerink L1, Postma AJ2, Andringa H3, Martin L4, Postma M5
1Asc Academics, Groningen, GR, Netherlands, 2Asc Academics, Groningen, Netherlands, 3University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands, 4Daiichi Sankyo Europe GmbH, Munich, Germany, 5University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Health Sciences, Groningen, Netherlands

OBJECTIVES: To analyse reimbursement trends by evaluating Health Technology Assessment (HTA) submissions and appraisals made for non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) over the last decade between the United Kingdom (UK) and the Netherlands.

METHODS: A search was conducted in the databases from UK (NICE) and the Netherlands (Dutch Health Care Institute (ZIN)) between January 2008 and December 2018 for NSCLC treatments. Exclusion criteria concerned: ‘treatments for small cell lung cancer’ and ‘treatments available before 2008 or HTA submissions after 2018’. HTA decisions were evaluated by drug class, indication, decision, economic- and budget impact outcomes.

RESULTS: 29 HTA submissions were appraised for 15 unique NSCLC treatments between 2008-2018. In the UK 76.9% of all HTA appraisals received a positive recommendation for reimbursement, of which 61.5% were conditional on a patient access agreement (PAS). In the Netherlands 25% initially received a negative recommendation for reimbursement by ZIN, however after negotiations with the Dutch government 93.7% of all submissions received reimbursement. The average duration for full HTA appraisals until final decision was significantly shorter for the Netherlands in comparison to the UK: 198 versus 313 days.

During this 10 years period the budget impact regulations changed as in 2015 the Netherlands implemented an annual budget impact cap of €2.5 million per year, and the UK implemented in 2017 a cap of £20 million in any of the first 3 years. When exceeded, negotiations for PAS agreements are mandatory for reimbursement in the UK regardless of the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER), while in the Netherlands the lock procedure for expensive medicines will be started. Both procedures can lead to a longer appraisal process.

CONCLUSIONS: Both countries show an increasing challenging reimbursement environment for NSCLC treatments. The amount of positive recommendations for reimbursement were similar in both countries, whereas the Netherlands showed a higher reimbursement rate after negotiations.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2019-11, ISPOR Europe 2019, Copenhagen, Denmark

Code

PCN286

Disease

Drugs, Oncology

Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×