COST-UTILITY OF ENTRECTINIB VERSUS CRIZOTINIB IN ROS1+ NSCLC PATIENTS- AN AUC MODEL ADAPTED TO ITALIAN CLINICAL PRACTICE
Author(s)
Bellone M1, Zaniolo O2, Martinelli E3, Marcelli G4, Orfanos P5, Pradelli L1
1AdRes HEOR, Torino, TO, Italy, 2AdRes HEOR, Turin, TO, Italy, 3Roche S.p.A., Monza, Italy, 4Roche spa, Monza, Italy, 5Roche S.p.A., Basel, Switzerland
Presentation Documents
OBJECTIVES : Better understanding of oncogenic signaling processes and subsequent therapy targeting specific alterations represent the real frontline of cancer treatment; entrectinib is a new inhibitor of the tyrosine kinases (TKI) encoded by the gene ROS1. An international AUC model has been adapted to Italian clinical practice in order to estimate its cost-utility in the treatment of ROS1+ NSCLC, with respect to crizotinib, currently TKI approved in Italy. METHODS : Main clinical drivers are PFS and OS curves, estimated by parametric extrapolation to observed data from the pooled entrectinib trials; given the lack of head-to-head studies, a Matched Adjusted Indirect Comparison has been carried out to estimate hazard ratios vs. crizotinib. Utilities are taken from STARTRK-2 data, valued with Italian tariffs. Economical inputs concern oral drug cost, without administration (both competitors), adverse events management, and supportive care; unit costs are based on national literature data and current tariffs, from NHS perspective. Drugs are costed based on protocol/label planned dose, observed length of treatment and parity price assumption. RESULTS : Lifetime model results estimated that entrectinib, when compared to crizotinib, induces a survival gain of 2.17 life years in the post-progression phase, corresponding to 1.39 QALYs. The associated cost increase of 117K €, mainly due to the improvement of life expectancy (paradox effect) and to longer TKI treatment duration, leads to an ICER of 54 K€/LY and to an ICUR around 80 K€/QALY. CONCLUSIONS : Entrectinib increases expected survival in ROS1+ NSCLC patients with an incremental cost-utility that can be considered acceptable, especially considering the approximation of ROS1-NSCLC to a rare disease. Main limitations are the ineluctable indirect comparison approach, that together with the poor knowledge on the natural history of the ROS1-NSCLC population make the analysis subject to considerable uncertainty.
Conference/Value in Health Info
2019-11, ISPOR Europe 2019, Copenhagen, Denmark
Code
PCN148
Topic
Economic Evaluation
Disease
Biologics and Biosimilars, Oncology