IMAGING SURVEILLANCE OF PATIENTS WITH OVARIAN CANCER AFTER SUCCEEDING EARLY TREATMENT- A CROSS-SECTIONAL ANALYSIS FROM REAL-WORLD DATA
Author(s)
Cho JY1, Jang SC1, Yoo SH2, Kwon SH2
1Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon-si, 41, South Korea, 2Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon-si, Gyeonggi-do, Korea, Republic of (South)
OBJECTIVES : Patients with ovarian cancer (OC) after succeeding early treatment have a long observation period to monitor recurrence. Clinical guidelines recommend that patients over 2-year of disease-free survival need less frequent monitoring. This study aims to investigate OC-related healthcare utilization (HCU) and costs according to the frequency of outpatient visit in OC patients on the observation period. METHODS : We conducted a descriptive, cross-sectional study using the national claims sample data of 2017, containing 3% of the total population in South Korea. We included patients with OC, having no claims for OC-related hospitalization in 2017. They were categorized into the infrequent and the frequent based on their number of OC-related outpatient visits for monitoring: less than 4 or not. HCU, including outpatient visit and monitoring, and OC-related direct costs were compared between two groups with focusing on imaging surveillance; magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography, x-ray, ultrasonography and positron-emission tomography. RESULTS : A total of 306 OC patients without OC-related hospitalization were identified. Those patients were classified as the frequent (N=47) and the infrequent group (N=259). The number of imaging for each visit were 1.139 and 1.135, respectively (p=0.882). The cost per visit for the frequent group (USD 458) was significantly higher than that of the infrequent group (USD 263, p<0.001). With focusing on imaging surveillance, computed tomography was preferred the most in both groups (58.5% of outpatient visits in the infrequent, 44.3% in the infrequent), and followed by X-rays for the frequent (37.7%) and ultrasonography, which is costly, for the infrequent group (30.4%), respectively. CONCLUSIONS : Use of costly imaging surveillance in the frequent group was higher than that in the infrequent group. Although a further study needs to investigate factors that contribute to the difference such as patients’ characteristics, proper management is required to avoid unnecessary HCU and to reduce the burden of OC.
Conference/Value in Health Info
2019-11, ISPOR Europe 2019, Copenhagen, Denmark
Code
PCN321
Topic
Health Service Delivery & Process of Care
Topic Subcategory
Disease Management, Hospital and Clinical Practices, Treatment Patterns and Guidelines
Disease
Oncology