COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF NIVOLUMAB FOR THE ADJUVANT TREATMENT OF PATIENTS WITH MELANOMA WITH INVOLVEMENT OF LYMPH NODES OR METASTATIC DISEASE WHO HAVE UNDERGONE COMPLETE RESECTION- AN ANALYSIS FROM A SWISS HEALTHCARE SYSTEM PERSPECTIVE

Author(s)

Oniangue-Ndza C1, Strittmatter G1, Orsini I2, Teitsson S3, Augusto M2, Amadi A4
1Bristol-Myers Squibb, Steinhausen, ZG, Switzerland, 2Parexel International, London, UK, 3Parexel International, London, LON, UK, 4Bristol-Myers Squibb, Uxbridge, UK

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this analysis was to assess the cost-effectiveness of nivolumab as an adjuvant treatment for adult patients with melanoma with involvement of lymph nodes or metastatic disease, from a healthcare system perspective in Switzerland.

METHODS

:
A Markov de novo global cost-effectiveness model was adapted to the Swiss setting. The analysis took a health-care payer perspective, over a 60-year time horizon. Nivolumab (240mg, every 2 weeks) was compared to observation, standard of care in Switzerland.

Recurrence-free survival (RFS) for nivolumab and observation was estimated through an indirect treatment comparison based on patient-level data from CheckMate 238 and CA184-029 trials, since both include ipilimumab as comparator. Overall survival (OS) was modelled using a RFS/OS correlation equation supported by published literature.

Drug acquisition, administration, monitoring, subsequent therapy and adverse events costs were sourced from published prices and clinical expert input. Utility values based on French EQ-5D tariffs were obtained from CheckMate 238 collected data. An annual discount rate of 3% was applied for both costs and effects. Input parameters’ uncertainty was tested in sensitivity analyses. Incremental cost-utility ratio (ICUR) was compared to a willingness-to-pay (WTP) of 100,000 CHF (Swiss Francs) per QALY gained.

RESULTS : In the base case, an incremental effect of 3.63 QALYs and incremental costs of CHF 64,114 were estimated with nivolumab, resulting in an ICUR of CHF 17,667 per QALY gained compared to observation. The parameters with the highest impact on the results were the effects’ discount rate and the HR of OS vs Post-recurrence survival (PRS) in the placebo arm. Nivolumab has approximately 53.2%, 74.8% and 99.0% probability of being cost-effective at a WTP threshold of CHF 18,000, 20,000 and 30,000 respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

:
Compared to observation, nivolumab was cost-effective as adjuvant treatment of melanoma in Switzerland, considering a WTP threshold of CHF 100,000 per QALY.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2019-11, ISPOR Europe 2019, Copenhagen, Denmark

Code

PCN208

Topic

Economic Evaluation, Organizational Practices

Topic Subcategory

Industry, Trial-Based Economic Evaluation

Disease

Oncology

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×