Comparing the International Price of Anticancer Drugs and Improving Their Accessibility in South Korea

Author(s)

Song JH1, Jung JH2, Lee JH3, You JE1, Hwang EB1, Joung KI4, Suh DC1
1Chung-Ang University, Seoul, Korea, Republic of (South), 2Novartis Korea Ltd., Seoul, Korea, Republic of (South), 3Hoseo University, Asan, Korea, Republic of (South), 4Chung-Ang University, Seoul, South Korea

OBJECTIVES : To compare the prices of new anticancer drugs in Korea with those of foreign countries and to explore the feasibility of a proposed ‘pre-listing and post-evaluation’ model that ensures patients have rapid access to new oncology drugs.

METHODS : An international survey was conducted to procure the official list prices per unit at ex-factory price of 18 anticancer drugs among nine countries (US, Japan, UK, Germany, France, Switzerland, and Italy: A7 countries, plus Canada and Australia: A9 countries) and compare them with those in Korea. Three price indices (Laspeyres, Paasche, and Fisher) and unweighted prices were calculated using Korea as the base country. Sales volumes of the study drugs for each country were obtained from the IMS data for 2013-2017. The budget impact of the proposed ‘pre-listing and post-evaluation’ model was estimated based on the difference between the initial listing price in Korea and the average or the lowest price in comparative countries.

RESULTS : The average and the lowest price indexes among A7 or A9 countries at normal exchange rates were 1.45-1.79 and 0.92-1.03 times higher, respectively, than in Korea, depending on the price indices used. The prices of anticancer drugs in Korea were very close to the lowest price index from A7 countries (price index=1.02). The relative prices in Korea increased when purchasing power parity was applied: the average price indexes in foreign countries were 1.12-1.29 times higher than in Korea. The financial burden for one-year early-listing model was estimated at 0.68% of the total anticancer drug sales in 2017.

CONCLUSIONS : Prices of anticancer drugs in Korea were similar to those among A7 countries based on the lowest price of anticancer drugs. It is recommended that a new ‘pre-listing and post-evaluation’ model, which references prices from A7 countries, be implemented to improve patient access to novel anticancer drugs.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2020-09, ISPOR Asia Pacific 2020, Seoul, South Korea

Value in Health Regional, Volume 22S (September 2020)

Code

PCN71

Topic

Economic Evaluation, Health Policy & Regulatory

Topic Subcategory

Budget Impact Analysis, Public Spending & National Health Expenditures

Disease

Drugs, Oncology

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×