A Meta-Analysis of Efficacy and Safety of Vesicular Monoamine Transporter Type 2 Inhibitors for Treatment of Huntington Chorea

Author(s)

Singh B1, Sharma A1, Mangat G2, Pandey S1, Siddiqui MK1, Sharma S1
1Parexel International, Mohali, PB, India, 2Parexel International, Mohali, CH, India

OBJECTIVES : Huntington’s disease (HD) is a rare, progressive, genetic neurodegenerative disorder. Chorea is the most common motor symptom of HD. We reviewed the clinical evidence of two approved vesicular monoamine transporter type-2 (VMAT2) inhibitors tetrabenazine and deutetrabenazine for the treatment of chorea in HD.

METHODS : A focused search of published literature was performed using Embase® and MEDLINE® from database inception to February 2020 to identify the studies assessing tetrabenazine and deutetrabenazine in HD patients. The meta-analyses were performed to compare the efficacy (Unified HD Rating Scale [UHDRS] total maximal chorea [TMC] score, motor scores, and patients (%) with Clinical Global Impression of Change [CGIC] improvement), safety, and tolerability of VMAT2-inhibitors against placebo using Stata software. Further, an indirect treatment comparison (ITC) was also conducted between tetrabenazine and deutetrabenazine.

RESULTS : Two double-blind, placebo-controlled, 12-week trials met the inclusion criteria. Both trials were performed by the same study group and were broadly similar in terms of methodological and clinical characteristics except UHDRS score requirements at baseline (≥10 vs. ≥8). VMAT2-inhibitors were associated with significantly better efficacy in terms of reducing UHDRS-TMC scores (mean difference [MD]:-2.83; 95%Confidence Interval [CI]:-3.80 to -1.86) and motor scores (MD:-3.78; 95%CI:-5.81 to -1.75) vs. placebo. The CGIC treatment success (proportion of patients with much or very much improvement) was significantly high with VMAT2-inhibitors vs. placebo (Odds ratio [OR]: 6.09; 95%CI: 2.57 to 14.42). Further, an ITC indicated comparable efficacy, safety, and tolerability of both treatments except dose reductions due to adverse events (DR-AEs). DR-AEs were significantly lower in deutetrabenazine as compared to tetrabenazine (OR: 0.04; 95%CI:0, 0.61).

CONCLUSIONS : Tetrabenazine and deutetrabenazine significantly ameliorated the chorea burden. In the absence of head to head studies, indirect comparisons signify comparable efficacy and safety of both agents for the treatment of Huntington chorea.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2020-09, ISPOR Asia Pacific 2020, Seoul, South Korea

Value in Health Regional, Volume 22S (September 2020)

Code

PND2

Topic

Clinical Outcomes

Topic Subcategory

Clinician Reported Outcomes, Comparative Effectiveness or Efficacy

Disease

Neurological Disorders

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×