Systematic Review of Economic Evaluations of Pneumococcal Conjugate Vaccines in Mainland China

Author(s)

Wang B1, Zhu S2, Babigumira JB3, Furnback W4, Chitale R5, Yang J2, Zhao K6, Wasserman M5
1Elysia Group LLC, New York, NY, USA, 2Pfizer Investment Co. Ltd., Beijing, China, 3University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA, 4Elysia Group LLC, NY, USA, 5Pfizer Inc., New York, NY, USA, 6China National Health Development Research Center, Beijing, China

OBJECTIVES

Pneumococcal conjugate vaccines (PCVs) protect against pneumococcal disease caused by Streptococcus pneumoniae bacteria. We conducted a systematic literature review of the cost-effectiveness of PCVs within Mainland China.

METHODS

A systematic literature review was undertaken to identify economic evaluations of PCV in Mainland China through 10/11/2019. The search string of ”pneumococc* AND conjugat* AND (vaccin* OR immun*) AND “economic OR cost-effectiveness OR cost-benefit OR cost-utility’ was used in the MEDLINE and EMBASE databases. Studies with economic evaluations on a national level in Mainland China were included while those not published in English or published prior to 1/1/2006 were excluded. Study characteristics, model inputs (clinical and economic), clinical outcomes, economic outcomes, and cost-effectiveness results were extracted from each study.

RESULTS

There were 7 studies identified, which contained 10 separate analyses comparing pneumococcal vaccination strategies. All analyses compared vaccination (PCV7 = 5; PCV10 = 1; PCV13 = 4;) to no vaccination. Of the 10 analyses, 80.0% (n=8) considered the vaccine to be cost-effective. All PCV10 and PCV13 analyses were considered cost-effective and three of the five PCV7 vs. no vaccination analyses were cost-effective. In studies evaluating more than one vaccine, vaccines with a higher valency had lower ICERs than vaccines with a lower valency when compared to no vaccination. The included studies utilized decision tree (n=5) and Markov models (n=2), were funded by non-industry (n=4) and industry (n=3), and took payer (n=4) and societal (n=4) perspectives. The incidence data for IPD, pneumonia, and otitis media utilized in the models were from a variety of sources and included CHIRA, Taiwan’s National Health Insurance Research Database, network meta-analysis, and surveillance studies in the literature.

CONCLUSIONS

PCVs were found to be cost-effective against no vaccination in Mainland China. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios for higher valent vaccines against no vaccination were mostly lower than lower valent vaccines.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2020-09, ISPOR Asia Pacific 2020, Seoul, South Korea

Value in Health Regional, Volume 22S (September 2020)

Code

PIN23

Topic

Economic Evaluation, Epidemiology & Public Health

Topic Subcategory

Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis, Public Health

Disease

Vaccines

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×