Healthcare Resource Utilization (HCRU) in Patients with Generalized Pustular Psoriasis (GPP) in JAPAN: A Claims Database Study
Author(s)
Golembesky AK1, Kotowsky N2, Gao R3, Yamazaki H4
1Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Ingelheim, Germany, 2Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Ridgefield, CT, USA, 3Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Danbury, CT, USA, 4Nippon Boehringer Ingleheim Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan
Presentation Documents
OBJECTIVES: GPP is a rare, severe, potentially life-threatening, systemic disease, characterized by recurrent acute flares comprising disseminated erythematous skin rash with sterile neutrophil-filled pustules, and may include systemic symptoms. So far, the burden of this disease is poorly understood. This study describes comorbidities and HCRU in GPP patients. METHODS: Patients were identified as having GPP if they had ≥1 inpatient or 1 outpatient ICD-10 L40.1 confirmed diagnosis code(s), separated by 30–365 days. All analyses were conducted via the Aetion Evidence Platform™ v3.17 using the Japan Medical Data Center, a Japanese database. The study period was from January 1, 2015 to February 28, 2019. The first diagnosis code marked the index date. A general population matched cohort (MC) of 4:1, based on age and sex, was generated for context. Patient characteristics, treatment, and all-cause utilization of inpatient and outpatient care during the 12-month follow-up (FU) were analyzed. Analyses were descriptive in nature; no formal comparisons were conducted. RESULTS: 125 patients with GPP were identified at baseline and 82 had ≥12 months’ FU. Three of the most common comorbidities reported for GPP patients compared with the MC were chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (GPP: 18.3% vs MC: 13.8%), asthma (15.9% vs 9.2%), and hyperlipidemia (6.1% vs 2.1%) at the 12-month FU. During this time, patients with GPP were more likely to be treated with a systemic therapy (biologic or non-biologic) compared with the MC (56.1% vs 5.8%). Compared with the MC, GPP patients had more days of outpatient visits (median: 8.0 vs 4.0), a greater frequency of inpatient visits (32.9% vs 6.1%) and were hospitalized for longer (median: 9.0 vs 4.5 days). CONCLUSIONS: This analysis suggests that in Japan, GPP patients have greater use of outpatient and inpatient care than the MC, highlighting an unmet need among this patient population.
Conference/Value in Health Info
2020-09, ISPOR Asia Pacific 2020, Seoul, South Korea
Value in Health Regional, Volume 22S (September 2020)
Code
PRO16
Topic
Economic Evaluation, Real World Data & Information Systems
Topic Subcategory
Health & Insurance Records Systems
Disease
Rare and Orphan Diseases, Systemic Disorders/Conditions