Suitability of Managed Access in England to Resolve Uncertainties in the Cost-Effectiveness of Tixagevimab–Cilgavimab for the Prevention of COVID-19

Author(s)

Austin C1, Lawrence T2, Norton S2, Strong T2
1National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, Manchester, LAN, UK, 2National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, Manchester, UK

Problem Statement: The Innovative Medicines Fund is a Managed Access Fund in England designed to allow patient access to clinically uncertain promising medicines while further evidence is collected to address uncertainty. The NICE Managed Access Team assesses the suitability of new technologies for managed access by producing a feasibility assessment and discussing suitability with stakeholders. The Managed Access Team has recently considered the suitability of tixagevimab–cilgavimab for managed access.

Description: Several factors emerged indicating that managed access would not feasibly resolve uncertainty. While there are uncertainties in the clinical evidence and further evidence generation will likely be relevant, it is unfeasible that these would be resolved by data collection through managed access. Unpredictable landscape changes including changes to baseline rates of infections and hospitalisations and emergence of new variants would not be resolved through further pre-specified data collection. Monitoring these changes would require constant surveillance and reactive guidance updates. Discussing real-world evidence with stakeholders identified several barriers. To generate evidence in managed access, widespread testing for COVID-19 infection and genomic analysis would be required. Additionally, a new national dataset would be required, or multiple diverse datasets linked: no single unified dataset exists that could track patients through the multiple services relevant to delivering tixagevimab-cilgavimab and subsequent care and testing. There is no relevant primary care data collection that has national coverage, and varied data collection practices exist between primary and secondary care. Therefore, effective collection would require significant amendments to existing, large data sources. Furthermore, existing patient consent and ethical approval would not allow data sharing between sources.

Lessons Learned: Tixagevimab–cilgavimab is currently not considered suitable for managed access by the NICE Managed Access Team. Barriers to managed access identified for this topic are likely to be common across infectious disease prevention topics.

Stakeholder perspective: Government-affiliated

Conference/Value in Health Info

2023-05, ISPOR 2023, Boston, MA, USA

Value in Health, Volume 26, Issue 6, S2 (June 2023)

Acceptance Code

CS12

Topic

Health Policy & Regulatory

Topic Subcategory

Coverage with Evidence Development & Adaptive Pathways

Disease

no-additional-disease-conditions-specialized-treatment-areas

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×