Using Real-World Evidence for Health Technology Assessment: Capacity Building of Parameter Calibration for Economic Evaluation of Trastuzumab Addition to Chemotherapy in Early Breast Cancer

Author(s)

Nugraha R1, Suharlim C2, Tsalatsita RM3, Listiani P4, Gurning E5, Kristin E6, At-Thobari J6
1Management Science for Health (MSH), Meford, MA, USA, 2Management Sciences for Health, Medford, MA, USA, 3Center for Health Financing and Insurance Management Policy, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing, and Public Health, University of Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia, 4Center for Health Financing Insurance Management Policy, Faculty of Medicine University of Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia, 5Ministry of Health, Government of Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia, 6Faculty of Medicine, Public Health and Nursing, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia

Problem Statement: Trastuzumab has been classified as cost-effectiveness treatment for breast cancer in all stages. Indonesia through its National Health Technological Agency has concluded that in the country, Trastuzumab is denoted not cost effective for metastatic breast cancer. However, currently there is no evidence of cost-effectiveness of Trastuzumab for early breast cancer.

Description: Using the Indonesia Cancer Registries “SRIKANDI,” we generate survival parameters derived from local data of 4 cancer hospitals, namely National Cancer Dharmais, Sardjito Hospital, Surabaya Oncology Hospital, as well as Cipto Mangunkusumo Central hospital. From the database, 743 of complete early breast cancer patients’ data were collected. Kaplan-Meier survival table and curve was then generated both in general and sub-population of early breast cancers (e.g. based on cinical, treatment, and socioeconomic variables). Transitional probability parameters were gathered from systematic reviews of established studies. Using both hand calibration and Nelder Mead, all parameters were calibrated, including survival parameters (e.g., overall survival) as well as transitional probability parameters.

Lessons Learned: Capacity building for calibration method was generated by technical consultants to the Ministry of Health and researchers from local university. From the activity, we conclude that reciprocal resource- as well as data-sharing is pivotal in ensuring the successful capacity building particularly for a highly technical work. Moreover, mitigation of certain limitations such as data completion as well as unfinished parallel work need to be recognized early so that parameters driven from the capacity building can be updated.

Stakeholder perspective: This lesson learnt is described from the perspective of technical consultants working for the capacity building. The recipient of capacity building includes the team of Ministry of Health (MoH) and researcher network from local universities (or ‘research agents’).

Conference/Value in Health Info

2023-05, ISPOR 2023, Boston, MA, USA

Value in Health, Volume 26, Issue 6, S2 (June 2023)

Acceptance Code

CS7

Topic

Economic Evaluation, Real World Data & Information Systems, Study Approaches

Topic Subcategory

Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis, Decision Modeling & Simulation, Health & Insurance Records Systems, Registries

Disease

Drugs

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×