Economic VALUE and Health System IMPACT of Remdesivir in Treating Hospitalized COVID-19 Patients in the United States

Author(s)

Sun F1, Jeyakumar S2, Smith N3
1Gilead Sciences Inc., Foster City, CA, USA, 2Maple Health Group, LLC, Jersey City, NJ, USA, 3Maple Health Group, LLC, New York, NY, USA

OBJECTIVES: In the ACTT-1 study in hospitalized adults with laboratory confirmed COVID-19, remdesivir was found to be superior to placebo in shortening time to recovery from COVID-19. However, the economic value and health system impact of remdesivir treatment is still unclear. This study evaluated remdesivir’s long-term cost-effectiveness and impact on health system capacities versus standard of care (SoC) for hospitalized COVID-19 patients in the United States (US).

METHODS: A hybrid decision-tree and Markov model simulated health and economic outcomes for hospitalized adult COVID-19 patients (average age of 58.9 years) from a US health system perspective over a lifetime horizon. Clinical inputs (e.g., hospitalization duration, mortality) were extracted from the ACTT-1 trial and real-world data. Cost inputs were sourced from an internal analysis or from the literature. Remdesivir acquisition cost was $390/vial, and patients were assumed to receive 6.25 vials per treatment course. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed. A separate treatment capacity analysis was performed on a national scale, assuming a population of 328,200,000 and one monthly incident cohort of 201,000 patients eligible for treatment.

RESULTS: Relative to SoC, remdesivir was associated with a decrease in total costs (savings of $8,844.49 per patient), increased life years (+0.62), and quality-adjusted life years (+0.47). Remdesivir was therefore dominant versus SoC (less costly and more effective). Results were robust in one-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses. In the treatment capacity analysis, remdesivir increased the available hospital capacity by 1.4%, available ICU capacity by 32.1%, and total ventilator capacity by 2.3%.

CONCLUSIONS: Remdesivir is a cost-effective option for the treatment of patients hospitalized with mild, moderate, and severe COVID-19 versus SoC. In addition, due to its demonstrated ability to shorten time to recovery, remdesivir is projected to increase treatment capacity by increasing the percentage of available hospital bed-, ICU bed-, and total ventilator capacity.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2021-05, ISPOR 2021, Montreal, Canada

Value in Health, Volume 24, Issue 5, S1 (May 2021)

Acceptance Code

IN3

Topic

Economic Evaluation

Topic Subcategory

Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis

Disease

Infectious Disease (non-vaccine)

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×